The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT NITROGEN FORMS BY COEXISTING PLANT SPECIES AND SOIL MICROBES
Abstract
The growing awareness that plants might use a variety of nitrogen (N) forms, both organic and inorganic, has raised questions about the role of resource partitioning in plant communities. It has been proposed that coexisting plant species might be able to partition a limited N pool, thereby avoiding competition for resources, through the uptake of different chemical forms of N. In this study, we used in situ stable isotope labeling techniques to assess whether coexisting plant species of a temperate grassland (England, UK) display preferences for different chemical forms of N, including inorganic N and a range of amino acids of varying complexity. We also tested whether plants and soil microbes differ in their preference for different N forms, thereby relaxing competition for this limiting resource. We examined preferential uptake of a range of 13C15N-labeled amino acids (glycine, serine, and phenylalanine) and 15N-labeled inorganic N by coexisting grass species and soil microbes in the field. Our data show that while coexisting plant species simultaneously take up a variety of N forms, including inorganic N and amino acids, they all showed a preference for inorganic N over organic N and for simple over the more complex amino acids. Soil microbes outcompeted plants for added N after 50 hours, but in the long-term (33 days) the proportion of added 15N contained in the plant pool increased for all N forms except for phenylalanine, while the proportion in the microbial biomass declined relative to the first harvest. These findings suggest that in the longer-term plants become more effective competitors for added 15N. This might be due to microbial turnover releasing 15N back into the plant-soil system or to the mineralization and subsequent plant uptake of 15N transferred initially to the organic matter pool. We found no evidence that soil microbes preferentially utilize any of the N forms added, despite previous studies showing that microbial preferences for N forms vary over time. Our data suggest that coexisting plants can outcompete microbes for a variety of N forms, but that such plant species show similar preferences for inorganic over organic N.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C
Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 · Cited by 12,887
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Hodge, A., Campbell, C. D., & Fitter, A. H. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35095041 · Cited by 1,129
Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen
Näsholm, T., Ekblad, A., Nordin, A., Giesler, R., Högberg, M., & Högberg, P. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31921 · Cited by 1,030
Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra
McKane, R. B., Johnson, L. C., Shaver, G. R., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Rastetter, E. B., Fry, B., Giblin, A. E., Kielland, K., Kwiatkowski, B. L., Laundre, J. A., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415068a · Cited by 902
Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms
Kaye, J. P., & Hart, S. C. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01001-x · Cited by 895
A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology
BARDGETT, R., BOWMAN, W., KAUFMANN, R., & SCHMIDT, S. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.005 · Cited by 870
Self-citationReynolds, H. L., Packer, A., Bever, J. D., & Clay, K. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0298 · Cited by 745
Preferential use of organic nitrogen for growth by a non-mycorrhizal arctic sedge
Chapin, F. S., Moilanen, L., & Kielland, K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361150a0 · Cited by 714
Amino Acid Absorption by Arctic Plants: Implications for Plant Nutrition and Nitrogen Cycling
Kielland, K. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940891 · Cited by 645
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Self-citationRoots, Nitrogen Transformations, and Ecosystem Services
Jackson, L. E., Burger, M., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092932 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, K. A., Bol, R., & Bardgett, R. D.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 989-999
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164944367
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 24.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT NITROGEN FORMS BY COEXISTING PLANT SPECIES AND SOIL MICROBES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/06-1018
- The paper
- Harrison, K. A., Bol, R., & Bardgett, R. D. (2007). PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT NITROGEN FORMS BY COEXISTING PLANT SPECIES AND SOIL MICROBES. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.