The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MEASURING SOCIAL–ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS BEHIND THE GENERATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Abstract
The generation of ecosystem services depends on both social and ecological features. Here we focus on management, its ecological consequences, and social drivers. Our approach combined (1) quantitative surveys of local species diversity and abundance of three functional groups of ecosystem service providers (pollinators, seed dispersers, and insectivores) with (2) qualitative studies of local management practices connected to these services and their underlying social mechanisms, i.e., institutions, local ecological knowledge, and a sense of place. It focused on the ecology of three types of green areas (allotment gardens, cemeteries, and city parks) in the city of Stockholm, Sweden. These are superficially similar but differ considerably in their management. Effects of the different practices could be seen in the three functional groups, primarily as a higher abundance of pollinators in the informally managed allotment gardens and as differences in the composition of seed dispersers and insectivores. Thus, informal management, which is normally disregarded by planning authorities, is important for ecosystem services in the urban landscape. Furthermore, we suggest that informal management has an important secondary function: It may be crucial during periods of instability and change as it is argued to promote qualities with potential for adaptation. Allotment gardeners seem to be the most motivated managers, something that is reflected in their deeper knowledge and can be explained by a sense of place and management institutions. We propose that co-management would be one possible way to infuse the same positive qualities into all management and that improved information exchange between managers would be one further step toward ecologically functional urban landscapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture
Pretty, J. N. (1995) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(95)00046-f · Cited by 1,753
Cited by
Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 · Cited by 1,871
Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.
Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., & Benton, T. G. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 · Cited by 1,595
A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., et al. (2014) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citationBenefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas
Elmqvist, T., Setälä, H., Handel, S., van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Blignaut, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Nowak, D., Kronenberg, J., & de Groot, R. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001 · Cited by 895
Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems
Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02197-120211 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersson, E., Barthel, S., & Ahrné, K.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1267-1278
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083551253
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MEASURING SOCIAL–ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS BEHIND THE GENERATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/06-1116.1
- The paper
- Andersson, E., Barthel, S., & Ahrné, K. (2007). MEASURING SOCIAL–ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS BEHIND THE GENERATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1116.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.