The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A HIERARCHICAL MODEL FOR SPATIAL CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DATA
Abstract
Estimating density is a fundamental objective of many animal population studies. Application of methods for estimating population size from ostensibly closed populations is widespread, but ineffective for estimating absolute density because most populations are subject to short-term movements or so-called temporary emigration. This phenomenon invalidates the resulting estimates because the effective sample area is unknown. A number of methods involving the adjustment of estimates based on heuristic considerations are in widespread use. In this paper, a hierarchical model of spatially indexed capture-recapture data is proposed for sampling based on area searches of spatial sample units subject to uniform sampling intensity. The hierarchical model contains explicit models for the distribution of individuals and their movements, in addition to an observation model that is conditional on the location of individuals during sampling. Bayesian analysis of the hierarchical model is achieved by the use of data augmentation, which allows for a straightforward implementation in the freely available software WinBUGS. We present results of a simulation study that was carried out to evaluate the operating characteristics of the Bayesian estimator under variable densities and movement patterns of individuals. An application of the model is presented for survey data on the flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) in Arizona, USA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation
Tanner, M. A., & Wong, W. H. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478458 · Cited by 3,928
The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters.
Cormack, R. M., & Seber, G. A. F. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531423 · Cited by 3,289
Analysis and Management of Animal Populations
Grand, J. B., Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., & Conroy, M. J. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802722 · Cited by 2,671
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978) · Wildlife Monographs · Cited by 2,442
Distance Sampling-Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.
Sprent, P., Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Laake, J. L. (1994) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404172 · Cited by 1,855
N‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts
Royle, J. A. (2004) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00142.x · Cited by 1,541
Self-citationESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS
Royle, J. A., & Nichols, J. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citationDistance Sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations
Buckland, S. T. (1993) · Cited by 1,249
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176
A Capture-Recapture Design Robust to Unequal Probability of Capture
Pollock, K. H. (1982) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3808568 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Camera Traps in Animal Ecology
(2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-99495-4 · Cited by 759
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12001 · Cited by 746
camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management
Niedballa, J., Sollmann, R., Courtiol, A., & Wilting, A. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12600 · Cited by 543
Risky business or simple solution – Relative abundance indices from camera-trapping
Sollmann, R., Mohamed, A., Samejima, H., & Wilting, A. (2013) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.025 · Cited by 397
Accounting for Imperfect Detection in Ecology: A Quantitative Review
Kellner, K. F., & Swihart, R. K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111436 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Royle, J. A., & Young, K. V.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2281-2289
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096971206
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A HIERARCHICAL MODEL FOR SPATIAL CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DATA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/07-0601.1
- The paper
- Royle, J. A., & Young, K. V. (2008). A HIERARCHICAL MODEL FOR SPATIAL CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DATA. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0601.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.