Cited by 527Remote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsWildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling

Vierling, Kerri T, Vierling, Lee A, Gould, William A, Martinuzzi, Sebastian, Clawges, Rick M·2008·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

Ecologists need data on animal–habitat associations in terrestrial and aquatic environments to design and implement effective conservation strategies. Habitat characteristics used in models typically incorporate (1) field data of limited spatial extent and/or (2) remote sensing data that do not characterize the vertical habitat structure. Remote sensing tools that directly characterize three-dimensional (3-D) habitat structure and that provide data relevant to organism–habitat interactions across a hierarchy of scales promise to improve our understanding of animal–habitat relationships. Laser altimetry, commonly called light detection and ranging (lidar), is a source of geospatial data that can provide fine-grained information about the 3-D structure of ecosystems across broad spatial extents. In this review, we present a brief overview of lidar technology, discuss recent applications of lidar data in investigations of animal–habitat relationships, and propose future applications of this technology to issues of broad species-management and conservation interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/070001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology have enabled much improved measurements of vegetation structure applicable to animal ecology studies.

    “Recent advances in Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology have enabled much improved measurements of vegetation structure applicable to animal ecology studies [24,25].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 527

Authors
Vierling, K. T., Vierling, L. A., Gould, W. A., Martinuzzi, S., & Clawges, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Vierling, Kerri T
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
90-98
ISSN
1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073597988
Cited by
527
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 39
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
LiDAR, laser altimetry, habitat characterization, habitat modeling, remote sensing, conservation, species management, ecosystem structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review