Cited by 237Climate change and permafrostSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Changes in vegetation in northern Alaska under scenarios of climate change, 2003-2100: implications for climate feedbacks

Euskirchen, E. S., McGuire, A. D., Chapin, F. S., Yi, S., Thompson, C. C.·2009·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Assessing potential future changes in arctic and boreal plant species productivity, ecosystem composition, and canopy complexity is essential for understanding environmental responses under expected altered climate forcing. We examined potential changes in the dominant plant functional types (PFTs) of the sedge tundra, shrub tundra, and boreal forest ecosystems in ecotonal northern Alaska, USA, for the years 2003–2100. We compared energy feedbacks associated with increases in biomass to energy feedbacks associated with changes in the duration of the snow‐free season. We based our simulations on nine input climate scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and a new version of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) that incorporates biogeochemistry, vegetation dynamics for multiple PFTs (e.g., trees, shrubs, grasses, sedges, mosses), multiple vegetation pools, and soil thermal regimes. We found mean increases in net primary productivity (NPP) in all PFTs. Most notably, birch (Betula spp.) in the shrub tundra showed increases that were at least three times larger than any other PFT. Increases in NPP were positively related to increases in growing‐season length in the sedge tundra, but PFTs in boreal forest and shrub tundra showed a significant response to changes in light availability as well as growing‐season length. Significant NPP responses to changes in vegetation uptake of nitrogen by PFT indicated that some PFTs were better competitors for nitrogen than other PFTs. While NPP increased, heterotrophic respiration (RH) also increased, resulting in decreases or no change in net ecosystem carbon uptake. Greater aboveground biomass from increased NPP produced a decrease in summer albedo, greater regional heat absorption (0.34 ± 0.23 W·m−2·10 yr−1[mean ± SD]), and a positive feedback to climate warming. However, the decrease in albedo due to a shorter snow season (−5.1 ± 1.6 d/10 yr) resulted in much greater regional heat absorption (3.3 ± 1.24 W·m−2·10 yr−1) than that associated with increases in vegetation. Through quantifying feedbacks associated with changes in vegetation and those associated with changes in the snow season length, we can reach a more integrated understanding of the manner in which climate change may impact interactions between high‐latitude ecosystems and the climate system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/08-0806.1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fire could slow regional warming through alteration of ecosystem energy balances by changing albedo.

    “Alternatively, fire could slow regional warming through the alteration of ecosystem energy balances by changing albedo; for example, reduced tree cover exposes proportionally more snow, thus increasing reflectance (Randerson et al., 2006; Euskirchen et al., 2009).”

    From The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth (2011) · cites this paper as Euskirchen et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Euskirchen, E. S., McGuire, A. D., Chapin, F. S., Yi, S., & Thompson, C. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • National Park Service (US)
Corresponding author
Euskirchen, E. S.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
1022-1043
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2168947040
Cited by
237
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Climate change and permafrost
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
climate change scenarios, plant functional types, net primary productivity, shrub tundra, boreal forest, Betula, albedo feedback, heat absorption, heterotrophic respiration, nitrogen uptake, climate feedbacks, northern Alaska, Terrestrial Ecosystem Model, growing season length, light availability, aboveground biomass
MeSH terms
Alaska, Arctic Regions, Carbon, Nitrogen, Plants, Seasons, Snow, Soil, Sunlight, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem, Cell Respiration, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review