Importance of tree- and species-level interactions with wildfire, climate, and soils in interior Alaska: Implications for forest change under a warming climate
Open accessAbstract
The boreal zone of Alaska is dominated by interactions between disturbances, vegetation, and soils. These interactions are likely to change in the future through increasing permafrost thaw, more frequent and intense wildfires, and vegetation change from drought and competition. We utilize an individual tree-based vegetation model, the University of Virginia Forest Model Enhanced (UVAFME), to estimate current and future forest conditions across sites within interior Alaska. We updated UVAFME for application within interior Alaska, including improved simulation of permafrost dynamics, litter decay, nutrient dynamics, fire mortality, and post-fire regrowth. Following these updates, UVAFME output on species-specific biomass and stem density was comparable to inventory measurements at various forest types within interior Alaska. We then simulated forest response to climate change at specific inventory locations and across the Tanana Valley River Basin on a 2 × 2 km2 grid. We derived projected temperature and precipitation from a five-model average taken from the CMIP5 archive under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Results suggest that climate change and the concomitant impacts on wildfire and permafrost dynamics will result in overall decreases in biomass (particularly for spruce (Picea spp.)) within the interior Tanana Valley, despite increases in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) biomass, and a resulting shift towards higher deciduous fraction. Simulation results also predict increases in biomass at cold, wet locations and at high elevations, and decreases in biomass in dry locations, under both moderate (RCP 4.5) and extreme (RCP 8.5) climate change scenarios. These simulations demonstrate that a highly detailed, species interactive model can be used across a large region within Alaska to investigate interactions between vegetation, climate, wildfire, and permafrost. The vegetation changes predicted here have the capacity to feed back to broader scale climate-forest interactions in the North American boreal forest, a region which contributes significantly to the global carbon and energy budgets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The representation of interactions between fire and below-ground processes must be improved within models to properly project landscape and biome changes.
“The representation of interactions between fire and below-ground processes must be improved within models to properly project landscape and biome changes (Foster et al., 2019;Pausas et al., 2018).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Foster et al., 2019
Cites
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013
Jolly, W. M., Cochrane, M. A., Freeborn, P. H., Holden, Z. A., Brown, T. J., Williamson, G. J., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8537 · Cited by 2,200 · see citing works
Euskirchen, E. S., McGuire, A. D., Chapin, F. S., Yi, S., & Thompson, C. C. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0806.1 · Cited by 237 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Ecosystem modeling has been used across Alaska to investigate the response of vegetation to climate and fire using models such as ALFRESCO, TEM, and ecosys (Rupp et al., 2007; Euskirchen et al., 2009; Genet et al., 2013; Mekonnen et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“The representation of interactions between fire and below-ground processes must be improved within models to properly project landscape and biome changes (Foster et al., 2019; Pausas et al., 2018).”
Self-citationSatellite observations document trends consistent with a boreal forest biome shift
Berner, L. T., & Goetz, S. J. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16121 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Foster, A. C., Armstrong, A. H., Shuman, J. K., Shugart, H. H., Rogers, B. M., Mack, M. C., Goetz, S. J., & Ranson, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Foster, Adrianna C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 409
- Pages
- 108765
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964548547
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Keywords
- forest fires, permafrost thaw, climate change, boreal forest, forest biomass, spruce, Populus tremuloides, post-fire regeneration, Tanana Valley, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios, CMIP5 projections, interior Alaska
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review