Cited by 67Fire effects on ecosystemsForest ecology and managementForest Management and Policy

Importance of tree- and species-level interactions with wildfire, climate, and soils in interior Alaska: Implications for forest change under a warming climate

Open access
Foster, Adrianna C., Armstrong, Amanda H., Shuman, Jacquelyn K., Shugart, Herman H., Rogers, Brendan M., Mack, Michelle C., Goetz, Scott J., Ranson, K. Jon·2019·Ecological Modelling

Abstract

The boreal zone of Alaska is dominated by interactions between disturbances, vegetation, and soils. These interactions are likely to change in the future through increasing permafrost thaw, more frequent and intense wildfires, and vegetation change from drought and competition. We utilize an individual tree-based vegetation model, the University of Virginia Forest Model Enhanced (UVAFME), to estimate current and future forest conditions across sites within interior Alaska. We updated UVAFME for application within interior Alaska, including improved simulation of permafrost dynamics, litter decay, nutrient dynamics, fire mortality, and post-fire regrowth. Following these updates, UVAFME output on species-specific biomass and stem density was comparable to inventory measurements at various forest types within interior Alaska. We then simulated forest response to climate change at specific inventory locations and across the Tanana Valley River Basin on a 2 × 2 km2 grid. We derived projected temperature and precipitation from a five-model average taken from the CMIP5 archive under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Results suggest that climate change and the concomitant impacts on wildfire and permafrost dynamics will result in overall decreases in biomass (particularly for spruce (Picea spp.)) within the interior Tanana Valley, despite increases in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) biomass, and a resulting shift towards higher deciduous fraction. Simulation results also predict increases in biomass at cold, wet locations and at high elevations, and decreases in biomass in dry locations, under both moderate (RCP 4.5) and extreme (RCP 8.5) climate change scenarios. These simulations demonstrate that a highly detailed, species interactive model can be used across a large region within Alaska to investigate interactions between vegetation, climate, wildfire, and permafrost. The vegetation changes predicted here have the capacity to feed back to broader scale climate-forest interactions in the North American boreal forest, a region which contributes significantly to the global carbon and energy budgets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108765

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The representation of interactions between fire and below-ground processes must be improved within models to properly project landscape and biome changes.

    “The representation of interactions between fire and below-ground processes must be improved within models to properly project landscape and biome changes (Foster et al., 2019;Pausas et al., 2018).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Foster et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, A. C., Armstrong, A. H., Shuman, J. K., Shugart, H. H., Rogers, B. M., Mack, M. C., Goetz, S. J., & Ranson, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
Corresponding author
Foster, Adrianna C.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
409
Pages
108765
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964548547
Cited by
67
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
forest fires, permafrost thaw, climate change, boreal forest, forest biomass, spruce, Populus tremuloides, post-fire regeneration, Tanana Valley, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios, CMIP5 projections, interior Alaska

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review