The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased belowground biomass and soil CO2 fluxes after a decade of carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm‐temperate forest
Abstract
Atmospheric CO 2 concentrations have risen 40% since the start of the industrial revolution. Beginning in 1996, the Duke Free‐Air CO 2 Enrichment experiment has exposed plots in a loblolly pine forest to an additional 200 μL/L CO 2 compared to trees growing in ambient CO 2. This paper presents new belowground data and a synthesis of results through 2008, including root biomass and nutrient concentrations, soil respiration rates, soil pore‐space CO 2 concentrations, and soil‐solution chemistry to 2 m depth. On average in elevated CO 2, fine‐root biomass in the top 15 cm of soil increased by 24%, or 59 g/m 2 (26 g/m 2 C). Coarse‐root biomass sampled in 2008 was twice as great in elevated CO 2 and suggests a storage of ~20 g C·m−2·yr−1. Root C and N concentrations were unchanged, suggesting greater belowground plant demand for N in high CO 2. Soil respiration was significantly higher by 23% on average as assessed by instantaneous infrared gas analysis and 24‐h integrated estimates. N fertilization decreased soil respiration and fine‐root biomass by ~10–20% in both ambient and elevated CO 2. In recent years, increases in root biomass and soil respiration grew stronger, averaging ~30% at high CO 2. Peak changes for root biomass, soil respiration, and other variables typically occurred in midsummer and diminished in winter. Soil CO 2 concentrations between 15 and 100 cm depths increased 36–60% in elevated CO 2. Differences from 30 cm depth and below were still increasing after 10 years' exposure to elevated CO 2, with soil CO 2 concentrations >10 000 μL/L higher at 70‐ and 100‐cm depths, potentially influencing soil acidity and rates of weathering. Soil solution Ca 2+ and total base cation concentrations were 140% and 176% greater, respectively, in elevated CO 2 at 200 cm depth. Similar increases were observed for soil‐solution conductivity and alkalinity at 200 cm in elevated CO 2. Overall, the effect of elevated CO 2 belowground shows no sign of diminishing after more than a decade of CO 2 enrichment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options
Singh, B. K., Bardgett, R. D., Smith, P., & Reay, D. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2439 · Cited by 1,069
Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x · Cited by 788
Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments
Norby, R. J., & Zak, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647 · Cited by 681
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming
Cheng, W., Parton, W. J., Gonzalez‐Meler, M. A., Phillips, R., Asao, S., McNickle, G. G., Brzostek, E., & Jastrow, J. D. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12440 · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, R. B., Cook, C. W., Pippen, J. S., & Palmer, S. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3352-3366
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2156780221
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased belowground biomass and soil CO2 fluxes after a decade of carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm‐temperate forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/08-1609.1
- The paper
- Jackson, R. B., Cook, C. W., Pippen, J. S., & Palmer, S. M. (2009). Increased belowground biomass and soil CO2 fluxes after a decade of carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm‐temperate forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1609.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.