Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 788

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long‐term CO 2 fumigation

Phillips, Richard P., Finzi, Adrien C., Bernhardt, Emily S.·2011·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 187–194 The degree to which rising atmospheric CO 2 will be offset by carbon (C) sequestration in forests depends in part on the capacity of trees and soil microbes to make physiological adjustments that can alleviate resource limitation. Here, we show for the first time that mature trees exposed to CO 2 enrichment increase the release of soluble C from roots to soil, and that such increases are coupled to the accelerated turnover of nitrogen (N) pools in the rhizosphere. Over the course of 3 years, we measured in situ rates of root exudation from 420 intact loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) roots. Trees fumigated with elevated CO 2 (200 p.p.m.v. over background) increased exudation rates (μg C cm −1 root h −1 ) by 55% during the primary growing season, leading to a 50% annual increase in dissolved organic inputs to fumigated forest soils. These increases in root‐derived C were positively correlated with microbial release of extracellular enzymes involved in breakdown of organic N ( R 2 = 0.66; P = 0.006) in the rhizosphere, indicating that exudation stimulated microbial activity and accelerated the rate of soil organic matter (SOM) turnover. In support of this conclusion, trees exposed to both elevated CO 2 and N fertilization did not increase exudation rates and had reduced enzyme activities in the rhizosphere. Collectively, our results provide field‐based empirical support suggesting that sustained growth responses of forests to elevated CO 2 in low fertility soils are maintained by enhanced rates of microbial activity and N cycling fuelled by inputs of root‐derived C. To the extent that increases in exudation also stimulate SOM decomposition, such changes may prevent soil C accumulation in forest ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 788

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
187-194
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2131922750
Cited by
788
References
51
FWCI
43.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long‐term CO 2 fumigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x
The paper
Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011). Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long‐term CO 2 fumigation. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.