The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long‐term CO 2 fumigation
Abstract
Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 187–194 The degree to which rising atmospheric CO 2 will be offset by carbon (C) sequestration in forests depends in part on the capacity of trees and soil microbes to make physiological adjustments that can alleviate resource limitation. Here, we show for the first time that mature trees exposed to CO 2 enrichment increase the release of soluble C from roots to soil, and that such increases are coupled to the accelerated turnover of nitrogen (N) pools in the rhizosphere. Over the course of 3 years, we measured in situ rates of root exudation from 420 intact loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) roots. Trees fumigated with elevated CO 2 (200 p.p.m.v. over background) increased exudation rates (μg C cm −1 root h −1 ) by 55% during the primary growing season, leading to a 50% annual increase in dissolved organic inputs to fumigated forest soils. These increases in root‐derived C were positively correlated with microbial release of extracellular enzymes involved in breakdown of organic N ( R 2 = 0.66; P = 0.006) in the rhizosphere, indicating that exudation stimulated microbial activity and accelerated the rate of soil organic matter (SOM) turnover. In support of this conclusion, trees exposed to both elevated CO 2 and N fertilization did not increase exudation rates and had reduced enzyme activities in the rhizosphere. Collectively, our results provide field‐based empirical support suggesting that sustained growth responses of forests to elevated CO 2 in low fertility soils are maintained by enhanced rates of microbial activity and N cycling fuelled by inputs of root‐derived C. To the extent that increases in exudation also stimulate SOM decomposition, such changes may prevent soil C accumulation in forest ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M. C., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., Miller, H. L., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Cited by 23,383
(2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,612
A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils
Anderson, J. P. E., & Domsch, K. H. (1978) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(78)90099-8 · Cited by 3,276
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance?
Read, D. J., & Perez‐Moreno, J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x · Cited by 1,613
Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil
Sinsabaugh, R. L. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.014 · Cited by 1,480
A meta-analysis of elevated CO 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology
Curtis, P. S., & Wang, X. (1998) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050381 · Cited by 1,349
Grayston, S. J., Vaughan, D., & Jones, D. (1997) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(96)00126-6 · Cited by 999
Forest response to elevated CO2is conserved across a broad range of productivity
Norby, R. J., DeLucia, E. H., Gielen, B., Calfapietra, C., Giardina, C. P., King, J. S., Ledford, J., McCarthy, H. R., Moore, D. J. P., Ceulemans, R., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509478102 · Cited by 987
Self-citationCO2 Enhancement of Forest Productivity Constrained by Limited Nitrogen Availability
Norby, R., Warren, J., Iversen, C., Garten, C., Medlyn, B., & McMurtrie, R. (2009) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2009.3747.1 · Cited by 976
Cited by
Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14859 · Cited by 2,477
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments
Norby, R. J., & Zak, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647 · Cited by 681
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-22
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-194
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2131922750
- Cited by
- 788
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 43.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long‐term CO 2 fumigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x
- The paper
- Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011). Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long‐term CO 2 fumigation. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.