Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of elevated N input on soil N cycling and losses in old‐growth lowland and montane forests in Panama

Corre, Marife D., Veldkamp, Edzo, Arnold, Julia, Wright, S. Joseph·2010·Ecology

Abstract

Nitrogen deposition is projected to increase rapidly in tropical ecosystems, but changes in soil‐N‐cycling processes in tropical ecosystems under elevated N input are less well understood. We used N‐addition experiments to achieve N‐enriched conditions in mixed‐species, lowland and montane forests in Panama. Our objectives were to (1) assess changes in soil mineral N production (gross rates of N mineralization and nitrification) and retention (microbial immobilization and rapid reactions to organic N) during 1‐ and 9‐yr N additions in the lowland forest and during 1‐yr N addition in the montane forest and (2) relate these changes to N leaching and N‐oxide emissions. In the old‐growth lowland forest located on an Inceptisol, with high base saturation and net primary production not limited by N, there was no immediate effect of first‐year N addition on gross rates of mineral‐N production and N‐oxide emissions. Changes in soil‐N processes were only apparent in chronic (9 yr) N‐addition plots: gross N mineralization and nitrification rates, NO 3− leaching, and N‐oxide emissions increased, while microbial biomass and NH 4+ immobilization rates decreased compared to the control. Increased mineral‐N production under chronic N addition was paralleled by increased substrate quality (e.g., reduced C:N ratios of litterfall), while the decrease in microbial biomass was possibly due to an increase in soil acidity. An increase in N losses was reflected in the increase in 15 N signatures of litterfall under chronic N addition. In contrast, the old‐growth montane forest located on an Andisol, with low base saturation and aboveground net primary production limited by N, reacted to first‐year N addition with increases in gross rates of mineral‐N production, microbial biomass, NO 3− leaching, and N‐oxide emissions compared to the control. The increased N‐oxide emissions were attributed to increased nitrification activity in the organic layer, and the high NO 3− availability combined with the high rainfall on this sandy loam soil facilitated the instantaneous increase in NO 3− leaching. These results suggest that soil type, presence of an organic layer, changes in soil‐N cycling, and hydrological properties are more important indicators than vegetation as an N sink on how tropical forests respond to elevated N input.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/09-0274.1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Corre, M. D., Veldkamp, E., Arnold, J., & Wright, S. J.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1715-1729
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2109797748
Cited by
176
References
4
FWCI
17.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of elevated N input on soil N cycling and losses in old‐growth lowland and montane forests in Panama. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/09-0274.1
The paper
Corre, M. D., Veldkamp, E., Arnold, J., & Wright, S. J. (2010). Impact of elevated N input on soil N cycling and losses in old‐growth lowland and montane forests in Panama. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0274.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.