Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence

Clark, James S., Bell, David, Chu, Chengjin, Courbaud, Benoit, Dietze, Michael, Hersh, Michelle, HilleRisLambers, Janneke, Ibášez, Inés, LaDeau, Shannon, McMahon, Sean, Metcalf, Jessica, Mohan, Jacqueline, Moran, Emily, Pangle, Luke, Pearson, Scott, Salk, Carl, Shen, Zehao, Valle, Denis, Wyckoff, Peter·2010·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

High biodiversity of forests is not predicted by traditional models, and evidence for trade‐offs those models require is limited. High‐dimensional regulation (e.g., N factors to regulate N species) has long been recognized as a possible alternative explanation, but it has not be been seriously pursued, because only a few limiting resources are evident for trees, and analysis of multiple interactions is challenging. We develop a hierarchical model that allows us to synthesize data from long‐term, experimental, data sets with processes that control growth, maturation, fecundity, and survival. We allow for uncertainty at all stages and variation among 26 000 individuals and over time, including 268 000 tree years, for dozens of tree species. We estimate population‐level parameters that apply at the species level and the interactions among latent states, i.e., the demographic rates for each individual, every year. The former show that the traditional trade‐offs used to explain diversity are not present. Demographic rates overlap among species, and they do not show trends consistent with maintenance of diversity by simple mechanisms (negative correlations and limiting similarity). However, estimates of latent states at the level of individuals and years demonstrate that species partition environmental variation. Correlations between responses to variation in time are high for individuals of the same species, but not for individuals of different species. We demonstrate that these relationships are pervasive, providing strong evidence that high‐dimensional regulation is critical for biodiversity regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/09-1541.1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Clark, J. S., Bell, D., Chu, C., Courbaud, B., Dietze, M., Hersh, M., HilleRisLambers, J., Ibášez, I., LaDeau, S., McMahon, S., Metcalf, J., Mohan, J., Moran, E., Pangle, L., Pearson, S., Salk, C., Shen, Z., Valle, D., & Wyckoff, P.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
569-608
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2048443287
Cited by
180
References
4
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/09-1541.1
The paper
Clark, J. S., Bell, D., Chu, C., Courbaud, B., Dietze, M., Hersh, M., HilleRisLambers, J., Ibášez, I., LaDeau, S., McMahon, S., Metcalf, J., Mohan, J., Moran, E., Pangle, L., Pearson, S., Salk, C., Shen, Z., Valle, D., & Wyckoff, P. (2010). High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1541.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.