The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence
Abstract
High biodiversity of forests is not predicted by traditional models, and evidence for trade‐offs those models require is limited. High‐dimensional regulation (e.g., N factors to regulate N species) has long been recognized as a possible alternative explanation, but it has not be been seriously pursued, because only a few limiting resources are evident for trees, and analysis of multiple interactions is challenging. We develop a hierarchical model that allows us to synthesize data from long‐term, experimental, data sets with processes that control growth, maturation, fecundity, and survival. We allow for uncertainty at all stages and variation among 26 000 individuals and over time, including 268 000 tree years, for dozens of tree species. We estimate population‐level parameters that apply at the species level and the interactions among latent states, i.e., the demographic rates for each individual, every year. The former show that the traditional trade‐offs used to explain diversity are not present. Demographic rates overlap among species, and they do not show trends consistent with maintenance of diversity by simple mechanisms (negative correlations and limiting similarity). However, estimates of latent states at the level of individuals and years demonstrate that species partition environmental variation. Correlations between responses to variation in time are high for individuals of the same species, but not for individuals of different species. We demonstrate that these relationships are pervasive, providing strong evidence that high‐dimensional regulation is critical for biodiversity regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems
Levin, S. A. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900037 · Cited by 1,726
Armstrong, R. A., & McGehee, R. (1980) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283553 · Cited by 1,016
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology
Violle, C., Enquist, B. J., McGill, B. J., Jiang, L., Albert, C. H., Hulshof, C., Jung, V., & Messier, J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,768
Next‐generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology
Scheiter, S., Langan, L., & Higgins, S. I. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12210 · Cited by 498
Ecological forecasting and data assimilation in a data-rich era
Luo, Y., Ogle, K., Tucker, C., Fei, S., Gao, C., LaDeau, S., Clark, J. S., & Schimel, D. S. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/09-1275.1 · Cited by 326
Self-citationHow variation between individuals affects species coexistence
Hart, S. P., Schreiber, S. J., & Levine, J. M. (2016) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12618 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, J. S., Bell, D., Chu, C., Courbaud, B., Dietze, M., Hersh, M., HilleRisLambers, J., Ibášez, I., LaDeau, S., McMahon, S., Metcalf, J., Mohan, J., Moran, E., Pangle, L., Pearson, S., Salk, C., Shen, Z., Valle, D., & Wyckoff, P.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-608
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2048443287
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/09-1541.1
- The paper
- Clark, J. S., Bell, D., Chu, C., Courbaud, B., Dietze, M., Hersh, M., HilleRisLambers, J., Ibášez, I., LaDeau, S., McMahon, S., Metcalf, J., Mohan, J., Moran, E., Pangle, L., Pearson, S., Salk, C., Shen, Z., Valle, D., & Wyckoff, P. (2010). High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1541.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.