Fire effects on temperate forest soil C and N storage
Open accessAbstract
Temperate forest soils store globally significant amounts of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N). Understanding how soil pools of these two elements change in response to disturbance and management is critical to maintaining ecosystem services such as forest productivity, greenhouse gas mitigation, and water resource protection. Fire is one of the principal disturbances acting on forest soil C and N storage and is also the subject of enormous management efforts. In the present article, we use meta-analysis to quantify fire effects on temperate forest soil C and N storage. Across a combined total of 468 soil C and N response ratios from 57 publications (concentrations and pool sizes), fire had significant overall effects on soil C (-26%) and soil N (-22%). The impacts of fire on forest floors were significantly different from its effects on mineral soils. Fires reduced forest floor C and N storage (pool sizes only) by an average of 59% and 50%, respectively, but the concentrations of these two elements did not change. Prescribed fires caused smaller reductions in forest floor C and N storage (-46% and -35%) than wildfires (-67% and -69%), and the presence of hardwoods also mitigated fire impacts. Burned forest floors recovered their C and N pools in an average of 128 and 103 years, respectively. Among mineral soils, there were no significant changes in C or N storage, but C and N concentrations declined significantly (-11% and -12%, respectively). Mineral soil C and N concentrations were significantly affected by fire type, with no change following prescribed burns, but significant reductions in response to wildfires. Geographic variation in fire effects on mineral soil C and N storage underscores the need for region-specific fire management plans, and the role of fire type in mediating C and N shifts (especially in the forest floor) indicates that averting wildfires through prescribed burning is desirable from a soils perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most of our understanding of how fire severity influences soil responses is based on the comparison between wildfire and prescribed fire.
“Most of our understanding of how fire severity influences soil responses is based on the comparison between wildfire and prescribed fire with the assumption that wildfires are more severe than prescribed fires (Nave, Vance, Swanston, & Curtis, 2011).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Nave et al., 2011
Cites
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Prescribed fires had no effect on mineral soil %C or %N.”
BackgroundThe meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Lal, R., Negassa, W., & Lorenz, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.002 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Mäkipää, R., Abramoff, R., Adamczyk, B., Baldy, V., Biryol, C., Bosela, M., Casals, P., Curiel Yuste, J., Dondini, M., Filipek, S., et al. (2023) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120637 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Reforestation can sequester two petagrams of carbon in US topsoils in a century
Nave, L. E., Domke, G. M., Hofmeister, K. L., Mishra, U., Perry, C. H., Walters, B. F., & Swanston, C. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719685115 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Nave, L. E., Vance, E. D., Swanston, C. W., & Curtis, P. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan Biological Station (US)
- National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nave, Lucas E.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1189-1201
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143712970
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- U.S. Forest Service
- Northern Research Station
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- fire effects on soil, temperate forest soils, soil carbon storage, soil nitrogen storage, forest floor, mineral soils, prescribed burning, forest fires, hardwood, post-fire recovery, fire management, carbon and nitrogen concentration
- MeSH terms
- Carbon, Fires, Nitrogen, Soil, Trees, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review