The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine‐scale niche partitioning
Open accessAbstract
Fungi play key roles in ecosystems as mutualists, pathogens, and decomposers. Current estimates of global species richness are highly uncertain, and the importance of stochastic vs. deterministic forces in the assembly of fungal communities is unknown. Molecular studies have so far failed to reach saturated, comprehensive estimates of fungal diversity. To obtain a more accurate estimate of global fungal diversity, we used a direct molecular approach to census diversity in a boreal ecosystem with precisely known plant diversity, and we carefully evaluated adequacy of sampling and accuracy of species delineation. We achieved the first exhaustive enumeration of fungi in soil, recording 1002 taxa in this system. We show that the fungus : plant ratio in Picea mariana forest soils from interior Alaska is at least 17:1 and is regionally stable. A global extrapolation of this ratio would suggest 6 million species of fungi, as opposed to leading estimates ranging from 616 000 to 1.5 million. We also find that closely related fungi often occupy divergent niches. This pattern is seen in fungi spanning all major functional guilds and four phyla, suggesting a major role of deterministic niche partitioning in community assembly. Extinctions and range shifts are reorganizing biodiversity on Earth, yet our results suggest that 98% of fungi remain undescribed and that many of these species occupy unique niches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09678 · Cited by 4,400 · cited 1×
“Earth has entered a period of unprecedented extinction (Barnosky et al. 2011), involv- ing species range shifts and overall reorganization of biodiversity.”
BackgroundHow Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B., & Worm, B. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 · Cited by 3,045 · cited 6×
“:P ratio is combined with the current estimate of vascular plant diversity of 352 000 (Paton et al. 2008), it would suggest a global fungal richness of 6 million species, as opposed to the 616 000 recently suggested by Mora et al. (2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExperimental Studies on the Struggle for Existence
Gause, G. F. (1932) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.9.4.389 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land
Treseder, K. K., & Lennon, J. T. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-15 · Cited by 625
Growing a circular economy with fungal biotechnology: a white paper
Meyer, V., Basenko, E. Y., Benz, J. P., Braus, G. H., Caddick, M. X., Csukai, M., de Vries, R. P., Endy, D., Frisvad, J. C., Gunde-Cimerman, N., et al. (2020) · Fungal Biology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40694-020-00095-z · Cited by 515
“The fungal kingdom is huge: six million species are estimated to exist on Earth [85], of which only a small proportion is known.”
BackgroundInfluentialMechanisms of fungal dissemination
Strickland, A. B., & Shi, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03736-z · Cited by 127
Koechli, C., Campbell, A. N., Pepe-Ranney, C., & Buckley, D. H. (2019) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.013 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, D. L., Hollingsworth, T. N., McFarland, J. W., Lennon, N. J., Nusbaum, C., & Ruess, R. W.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-20
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2015579345
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 35.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine‐scale niche partitioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/12-1693.1
- The paper
- Taylor, D. L., Hollingsworth, T. N., McFarland, J. W., Lennon, N. J., Nusbaum, C., & Ruess, R. W. (2014). A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine‐scale niche partitioning. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1693.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.