The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fine‐root responses to fertilization reveal multiple nutrient limitation in a lowland tropical forest
Abstract
Questions remain as to which soil nutrients limit primary production in tropical forests. Phosphorus (P) has long been considered the primary limiting element in lowland forests, but recent evidence demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in response to nutrient addition, highlighting a need to understand and diagnose nutrient limitation across diverse forests. Fine‐root characteristics including their abundance, functional traits, and mycorrhizal symbionts can be highly responsive to changes in soil nutrients and may help to diagnose nutrient limitation. Here, we document the response of fine roots to long‐term nitrogen (N), P, and potassium (K) fertilization in a lowland forest in Panama. Because this experiment has demonstrated that N and K together limit tree growth and P limits fine litter production, we hypothesized that fine roots would also respond to nutrient addition. Specifically we hypothesized that N, P, and K addition would reduce the biomass, diameter, tissue density, and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots, and increase nutrient concentration in root tissue. Most morphological root traits responded to the single addition of K and the paired addition of N and P, with the greatest response to all three nutrients combined. The addition of N, P, and K together reduced fine‐root biomass, length, and tissue density, and increased specific root length, whereas root diameter remained unchanged. Nitrogen addition did not alter root N concentration, but P and K addition increased root P and K concentration, respectively. Mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots declined with N, increased with P, and was unresponsive to K addition. Although plant species composition remains unchanged after 14 years of fertilization, fine‐root characteristics responded to N, P, and K addition, providing some of the strongest stand‐level responses in this experiment. Multiple soil nutrients regulate fine‐root abundance, morphological and chemical traits, and their association with mycorrhizal fungi in a species‐rich lowland tropical forest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Cited by
Nutrient limitation of soil microbial processes in tropical forests
Camenzind, T., Hättenschwiler, S., Treseder, K. K., Lehmann, A., & Rillig, M. C. (2018) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1279 · Cited by 454
Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia
Reichert, T., Rammig, A., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Quesada, C. A., & Fleischer, K. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17985 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Wurzburger, N., & Wright, S. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2137-2146
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2144111292
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine‐root responses to fertilization reveal multiple nutrient limitation in a lowland tropical forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/14-1362.1
- The paper
- Wurzburger, N., & Wright, S. J. (2015). Fine‐root responses to fertilization reveal multiple nutrient limitation in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1362.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.