Cited by 138Forest Management and PolicyPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest ecology and management

Managing uncertainty in climate-driven ecological models to inform adaptation to climate change

Open access
Littell, Jeremy S., McKenzie, Donald, Kerns, Becky K., Cushman, Samuel, Shaw, Charles G.·2011·Ecosphere

Abstract

The impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems are likely to require changes in forest planning and natural resource management. Changes in tree growth, disturbance extent and intensity, and eventually species distributions are expected. In natural resource management and planning, ecosystem models are typically used to provide a “best estimate” about how forests might work in the future and thus guide decision-making. Ecosystem models can be used to develop forest management strategies that anticipate these changes, but limited experience with models and model output is a challenge for managers in thinking about how to address potential effects of climate change. What do decision makers need to know about climate models, ecological models used for impacts assessments, and the uncertainty in model projections in order to use model output in strategies for adaptation to climate change? We present approaches for understanding and reducing the uncertainty associated with modeling the effects of climate change on ecosystems, focusing on multi-model approaches to clarify the strengths and limits of projections and minimize vulnerability to undesirable consequences of climate change. Scientific uncertainties about changes in climate or projections of their impacts on resources do not present fundamental barriers to management and adaptation to climate change. Instead, many of these uncertainties can be controlled by characterizing their effects on models and future projections from those models. There is uncertainty in decision making that does not derive just from the complex interaction of climate and ecosystem models, but in how modeling is integrated with other aspects of the decision environment such as choice of objectives, monitoring, and approach to assessment. Adaptive management provides a hedge against uncertainty, such that climate and ecosystem models can inform decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/es11-00114.1

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainties in projected fire changes are due to inherent differences among GCMs.

    “These uncertainties are due to inherent differences among GCMs (Meehl et al. 2007, Littell et al. 2011), illustrated in our climate agreement maps, and are a key motivation for global multi-model ensemble analyses such as those presented here.”

    From Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity (2012) · cites this paper as Littell et al. 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Campbell, J. L., L. E. Rustad, E. W. Boyer, S. F. Christopher, C. T. Driscoll, I. J. Fernandez, P. M. Groffman, D. Houle, J. Kiekbusch, A. H. Magill, M. J. Mitchell, and S. V. Ollinger. 2009. Conse- quences of climate change for biogeochemical cycling in forests of northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:264-284.
  2. Hilborn, R. 1987. Living with uncertainty in resource management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 7:1-5.
  3. Joyce, L. A., G. Blate, J. Littell, S. McNulty, C. Millar, S. Moser, R. Neilson, K. O'Halloran, and D. L. Peterson. 2008. National forests. Pages 3.1-3.127
  4. in S. H. Julius, J. M. West, J. S. Baron, B. Griffith, L. A. Joyce, P. Kareiva, B. D. Keller, M. A. Palmer, C. H. Peterson, and J. M. Scott, editors. Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources. Synthesis and Assess- ment Product 4.4. Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  5. Robinson, D. C. E., S. J. Beukema, and L. A. Greig. 2008. Vegetation models and climate change workshop results. ESSA Technologies Ltd, Vancou- ver, BC, Canada. hhttp://www.essa.com/documents/ Vegetation%20Models%20and%20Climate% 20Change%20-%20Workshop%20Results.
  6. Rosenzweig, C., and W. Solecki. 2010. New York City adaptation in context. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1196:19-28. [doi: 10.1111/j. 1749-6632.2009.05308.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Littell, J. S., McKenzie, D., Kerns, B. K., Cushman, S., & Shaw, C. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Littell, Jeremy S.
Venue
Ecosphere
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
art102
ISSN
2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021343386
Cited by
138
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ecosphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (NA17RJ1232)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA17RJ1232)
  • Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
climate change adaptation, forests, ecosystem models, uncertainty reduction, multi-model approach, adaptive management, forest management planning, natural resource management, climate change projections, decision making under uncertainty, tree growth, disturbance, species distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review