The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disturbance interactions: characterization, prediction, and the potential for cascading effects
Open accessAbstract
Disturbances are fundamental components of ecosystems and, in many cases, a dominant driver of ecosystem structure and function at multiple spatial and temporal scales. While the effect of any one disturbance may be relatively well understood, multiple interacting disturbances can cause unexpected disturbance behavior (e.g., larger extents), altered return likelihoods, or reduced ecosystem resilience and regime shifts. Given the long‐lasting implications of such events, and the potential for changes in disturbance rates driven by climate change and increasing anthropogenic pressures, developing a broad conceptual understanding and some predictive ability regarding the likelihood of interactions between disturbances is crucial. Through a broad synthesis of the literature, and across multiple biomes, disturbance interactions are placed into a unified framework around the concept of changing ecosystem resistance (“linked interactions,” alterations to likelihood, extent, or severity) or ecosystem resilience (“compound interactions,” alterations to recovery time or trajectory). Understanding and predicting disturbance interactions requires disaggregating disturbances into their constituent legacies, identifying the mechanisms which drive disturbances behavior (or ecosystem recovery), and determining when and where those mechanisms might be altered by the legacies of prior disturbances. The potential for cascading effects is discussed, by which these interactions may extend the reach of anthropogenic or climate change‐induced alterations to disturbances beyond what is currently anticipated. Finally, several avenues for future research are outlined, as suggested from the current literature (and areas in which that literature is lacking). These include the potential for cross‐scale interactions and changing scale‐driven limitations, further work on cascading effects, and the potential for cross‐biome comparisons. Disturbance interactions have the potential to cause large, nonlinear, or unexpected changes in ecosystem structure and functioning; finding generality across these complex events is an important step in predicting their occurrence and understanding their significance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Holling, C. S. (1973) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · Cited by 18,995
Connell, J. H. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.199.4335.1302 · Cited by 9,417
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176
Tropical cyclones and climate change
Knutson, T. R., McBride, J. L., Chan, J., Emanuel, K., Holland, G., Landsea, C., Held, I., Kossin, J. P., Srivastava, A. K., & Sugi, M. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo779 · Cited by 3,194
Catastrophes, Phase Shifts, and Large-Scale Degradation of a Caribbean Coral Reef
Hughes, T. P. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.265.5178.1547 · Cited by 2,909
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Weaver, T., & Grime, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898436 · Cited by 2,548
Climate Change and Forest Disturbances
DALE, V. H., JOYCE, L. A., MCNULTY, S., NEILSON, R. P., AYRES, M. P., FLANNIGAN, M. D., HANSON, P. J., IRLAND, L. C., LUGO, A. E., PETERSON, C. J., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:ccafd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,240
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02952-3 · Cited by 2,121
Cited by
Forest disturbances under climate change
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3303 · Cited by 2,878
Microbial Community Resilience across Ecosystems and Multiple Disturbances
Philippot, L., Griffiths, B. S., & Langenheder, S. (2021) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00026-20 · Cited by 562
A theory of pulse dynamics and disturbance in ecology
Jentsch, A., & White, P. (2019) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2734 · Cited by 298
Kane, J. M., Varner, J. M., Metz, M. R., & van Mantgem, P. J. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.037 · Cited by 95
Do insect outbreaks reduce the severity of subsequent forest fires?
Meigs, G. W., Zald, H. S. J., Campbell, J. L., Keeton, W. S., & Kennedy, R. E. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/045008 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Buma, B.
- Venue
- Ecosphere
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032841615
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 17.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disturbance interactions: characterization, prediction, and the potential for cascading effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/es15-00058.1
- The paper
- Buma, B. (2015). Disturbance interactions: characterization, prediction, and the potential for cascading effects. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1890/es15-00058.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.