Measuring Emotional Abuse in Dating Relationships as a Multifactorial Construct
Abstract
Initial investigations of a multifactorial approach to the measurement of emotional abuse in dating relationships are presented. A set of 54 items was generated to assess 4 rationally derived subscales measuring Restrictive Engulfment, Hostile Withdrawal, Denigration, and Dominance / Intimidation. An exploratory factor analysis on reports of partner behavior by 157 female undergraduate students in dating relationships provided support for the hypothesized subscales. Denigration and Dominance/Intimidation had consistently higher correlations with physical aggression than did the other two forms of emotional abuse. Further evidence for discriminant and convergent validity was apparent in correlations with the circumplex scales of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, and with self-reported attachment variables. The results support the assessment of emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The original MMEA has internal consistency coefficients ranging from .83 to .92 and a four-factor structure accounting for approximately 55% of the total variance.
“Additionally, the strong psychometric properties of the original scale have been well documented, with internal consistency coefficients ranging from .83 to .92 and a four-factor structure accounting for approximately 55% of the total variance (Murphy & Hoover, 1999).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Murphy & Hoover, 1999
Widely used multidimensional psychological IPV instruments such as the MMEA and the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory demonstrate strong psychometric performance, including stable factor structures and high internal consistency coefficients.
“For example, widely used multidimensional psychological IPV instruments such as the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse (MMEA) (28 items; Murphy & Hoover, 1999) and the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory 58 items; Tolman, 1989) demonstrate strong psychometric performance, including stable factor structures and high internal consistency coefficients (often in the .80–.90 range).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Murphy & Hoover, 1999
Among predominantly heterosexual women, higher attachment anxiety reliably corresponds to greater engagement in psychological IPV perpetration.
“This association is particularly evident among predominantly heterosexual women, for whom higher attachment anxiety reliably corresponds to greater engagement in psychological IPV perpetration (e.g., Murphy & Hoover, 1999; Toplu-Demirtaş et al., 2018).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Murphy & Hoover, 1999
The original MMEA validation provided evidence for convergent and discriminant validity, as all subdimensions correlated significantly with physical aggression (rs = .29-.74).
“The original validation also provided evidence for convergent and discriminant validity, as all subdimensions correlated significantly with physical aggression (rs = .29–.74).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Murphy & Hoover, 1999
Prior research has identified several core domains of psychological IPV: Restrictive Engulfment, Denigration, Hostile Withdrawal, and Dominance/Intimidation.
“Consistent with this multidimensionality, prior research has identified several core domains of psychological IPV, such as Restrictive Engulfment, Denigration, Hostile Withdrawal, and Dominance/Intimidation, that together capture the breadth of psychological abusive behaviors (e.g., Murphy & Hoover, 1999; Tolman, 1989).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Murphy & Hoover, 1999
The short form of the MMEA-TR retains the original factorial structure and functions consistently across diverse gender and sexual orientation groups.
“These findings indicate that the short form of the MMEA-TR retains the original factorial structure (Maldonado et al., 2022; Murphy & Hoover, 1999) and functions consistently across diverse gender and sexual orientation groups.”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Murphy & Hoover, 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 342
- Authors
- Murphy, C. M., & Hoover, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- Venue
- Violence and Victims
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-53
- ISSN
- 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7073
- OpenAlex
- W162001538
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- emotional abuse, dating relationships, intimate partner violence, denigration, physical aggression, scale development, subscales, attachment, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, female undergraduates
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Courtship, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hostility, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouse Abuse, Students, Universities, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review