CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaResilience and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Resilience in Preschool Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence

Howell, Kathryn H., Graham-Bermann, Sandra A., Czyz, Ewa, Lilly, Michelle·2010·Violence and Victims
DOI 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.150
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined why some preschool-age children exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) showed deleterious outcomes and others appeared more resilient. Resilience, conceptualized as strengths in emotion regulation and prosocial skills, was evaluated using the Social Competence Scale developed by the Conduct Problem Prevention Research Group. The sample consisted of 56 mothers and their 4- to 6-year-old children exposed to IPV within the past 2 years. After controlling for relevant demographic factors, hierarchical regression analyses indicated that better parenting performance, fewer maternal mental health problems, and less severe violence exposure predicted better emotion regulation and prosocial skill scores, which in turn were negatively correlated with maladaptive child behaviors. These findings can be used to inform and enhance clinical services for children exposed to IPV.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.150

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Howell, K. H., Graham-Bermann, S. A., Czyz, E., & Lilly, M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
ORCID
Venue
Violence and Victims
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company
Published
2010-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
150-164
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
DOI
10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.150
OpenAlex
W2112618864
Cited by
144
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
intimate partner violence, preschool children, child resilience, emotion regulation, prosocial skills, social competence, maternal mental health, child abuse
MeSH terms
Adult, Child Behavior, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Reactive Disorders, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Michigan, Mother-Child Relations, Self Concept, Socialization, Socioeconomic Factors, Spouse Abuse, Child of Impaired Parents, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review