CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Empirical Evaluation of an Expanded Nursing Stress Scale

French, Susan E., Lenton, Rhonda, Walters, Vivienne, Eyles, John·2000·Journal of Nursing Measurement
DOI 10.1891/1061-3749.8.2.161
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the study of work-related stress among nurses, the Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) is the best known and most widely used scale. This article presents an overview of the NSS and its use, and describes the development of an expanded instrument (ENSS) to measure sources and frequency of stress perceived by nurses. Findings are based on a random sample of 2,280 nurses in Ontario working in a wide range of work settings. Pretests for the study indicated that an expanded version of the NSS was necessary in order to adequately measure sources of stress among nurses. The sources of stress comprised nine subscales—death and dying, conflict with physicians, inadequate preparation, problems with peers, problems with supervisors, workload, uncertainty concerning treatment, patients and their families, and discrimination. Confirmatory factor analyses, run on two randomly selected halves of the sample, came close to meeting standard criteria levels. The alpha coefficients of eight of the subscales were .70 or higher, and concurrent and construct validity assessments provided strong support for the expanded NSS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/1061-3749.8.2.161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 281

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
French, S. E., Lenton, R., Walters, V., & Eyles, J.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
ORCID
Eyles, John
Venue
Journal of Nursing Measurement
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company
Published
2000-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
161-178
ISSN
  • 1061-3749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7049
DOI
10.1891/1061-3749.8.2.161
OpenAlex
W237649652
Cited by
281
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bowel and Cancer Research
  • Sarcoma UK
  • European Society of Coloproctology
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR16.136.79)
  • Bowel Disease Research Foundation
  • Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland
  • Vascular Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
Nursing Stress Scale, Expanded Nursing Stress Scale, nurse stress, occupational stress, nurses, scale development, psychometric validation, factor structure, stressors, workload, nurse-physician conflict, discrimination, death and dying, supervisor-employee relations, peer relationships
MeSH terms
Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Nurses, Occupational Diseases, Ontario, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review