Cited by 674Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The Nursing Stress Scale: Development of an instrument

Gray-Toft, Pamela, Anderson, James G.·1981·Journal of Behavioral Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01321348

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray-Toft, P., & Anderson, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Methodist Hospital (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Assessment
Published
1981-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
11-23
ISSN
  • 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3505
OpenAlex
W1995211756
Cited by
671
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
Nursing Stress Scale, nurse stress, hospital nurses, stress measurement instrument, scale development, burnout, job satisfaction, nurse turnover, trait anxiety, factor analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, hospital departments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review