Cited by 49

The Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on Relationship Satisfaction Over Time for Young At-Risk Couples: The Moderating Role of Observed Negative and Positive Affect

Shortt, Joann Wu, Capaldi, Deborah M., Kim, Hyoun K., Laurent, Heidemarie K.·2010·Partner Abuse

Abstract

In the current study, the moderating effects of observed negative and positive affects on the association between intimate partner violence (IPV, physical aggression) and relationship satisfaction were examined over a 5-year period. Multiwave data were obtained from a sample of young adult men at risk for delinquency and their women partners (n = 121 couples; ages 21–26 years). The trajectory of each partner’s relationship satisfaction and the effects of dyadic IPV and affect were tested using HLM analyses and a two-level (within-couple and between-couple) dyadic growth model. Average levels of dyadic positive affect were associated with relationship satisfaction for both men and women. For men, increases in couples’ positive affect over time were linked to increases in relationship satisfaction, and increases in couples’ externalizing negative affect were linked to decreases in satisfaction. For women, higher levels of couples’ IPV predicted lower levels of satisfaction. Couples’ internalizing negative affect amplified the effects of IPV on satisfaction over time. Increases in IPV were associated with declines in satisfaction for couples with high levels of internalizing negative affect. Conversely, average levels of externalizing negative affect did not amplify the association between IPV and relationship satisfaction. In fact, the adverse influence of IPV on relationship satisfaction was greater for couples who displayed low levels of externalizing negative affect. Because of the inverse association between externalizing negative affect and relationship satisfaction, these findings were interpreted to suggest that the salience of IPV was greater in couples whose relationship satisfaction was not already impaired by high levels of negative affect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/1946-6560.1.2.131

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional IPV and negative interaction cycles are overlapping phenomena on a continuum where more severe behaviors would be attributed to emotional IPV.

    “In addition, it is important to consider the two as overlapping phenomena on a continuum where more severe forms of behaviors would be attributed to that of emotional IPV (e.g., intentionally aggressive, or hostile behaviors and controlling actions) due to IPV behaviors often being seen as maladaptive conflict resolution behaviors in more severe forms (Bonache et al., 2019;Shortt et al., 2010).”

    From The relationship between emotional intimate partner violence and other forms of violence: A metaanalytic review. (2024) · cites this paper as Shortt et al., 2010

    The Discussion describes IPV and negative affect during couples’ interactions as related factors, and the paper examines how they jointly relate to relationship satisfaction. It does not place negative interaction cycles and emotional IPV on a severity continuum. The Methods > Measures section defines the study’s IPV construct in terms of physical aggression, not the hostile or controlling behaviors the claim assigns to emotional IPV; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Atkins DC Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: Basic and advanced issues Journal of Family Psychology 2005 19 98 110 15796656
  2. Bakeman R Casey RL Analyzing family interaction: Taking time into account Journal of Family Psychology 1995 9 131 143
  3. Baron RM Kenny DA The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategies, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986 51 1173 1182 3806354
  4. Bradbury TN Karney BR Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage Journal of Marriage and Family 2004 66 862 879
  5. Capaldi DM Shortt JW Crosby L Physical and psychological aggression in at-risk young couples: Stability and change in young adulthood Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2003 49 1 27
  6. Capaldi DM Shortt JW Kim HK Pinsof W Lebow J A life span developmental systems perspective on aggression toward a partner Family psychology: The art of the science 2005 141 167 Oxford University Press New York
  7. Farrington DP Thornberry TP Krohn MD Key results from the first forty years of the Cambridge Study in Delinquency Development Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies 2003 137 183 Springer New York
  8. Fergusson DM Boden JM Horwood LJ Developmental antecedents of interpartner violence in a New Zealand birth cohort Journal of Family Violence 2008 23 737 753
  9. Fincham FD Stanley SM Beach SRH Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends Journal of Marriage and Family 2007 69 275 292 19890466 PMC2771855
  10. Finkel EJ Impelling and inhibiting forces in the perpetration of IPV Review of General Psychology 2007 11 193 207
  11. Fritz PA O’Leary KD Physical and psychological partner aggression across a decade: A growth curve analysis Violence and Victims 2004 19 3 16 15179743
  12. Frye NE Karney BR The context of aggressive behavior in marriage: A longitudinal study of newlyweds Journal of Family Psychology 2006 20 12 20 16569085
  13. Gottman JM Coan J Carrère S Swanson C Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions Journal of Marriage and the Family 1998 60 5 22
  14. Gottman JM Levenson RW The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period Journal of Marriage and Family 2000 62 737 745
  15. Gottman JM Murray JD Swanson CC Tyson R Swanson KR The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models 2002 MIT Cambridge, MA
  16. Hellmuth JC McNulty JK Neuroticism, marital violence, and the moderating role of stress and behavioral skills Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008 95 166 180 18605858
  17. Jacobson NS Gottman JM Gortner E Berns S Shortt JW Psychological factors in the longitudinal course of battering: When do the couples split up? When does the abuse decrease? Violence and Victims 1996 11 371 392 9210278
  18. Kim HK Capaldi DM The association of antisocial behavior and depressive symptoms between partners and risk for aggression in romantic relationships Journal of Family Psychology 2004 18 82 96 14992612
  19. Kim HK Capaldi DM Crosby L Generalizability of Gottman and colleagues’ affective process models of couples’ relationship outcomes Journal of Marriage and Family 2007 69 55 72 17372624 PMC1828692
  20. Kim HK Laurent HK Capaldi DM Feingold A Men’s aggression toward women: A 10-year panel study Journal of Marriage and Family 2008 70 1169 1187 19122790 PMC2613333
  21. Langer A Lawrence E Barry RA Using a vulnerability-stress-adaptation framework to predict physical aggression trajectories in newlywed marriage Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2008 76 756 768 18837593
  22. Laurent HK Kim HK Capaldi DM Interaction and relationship development in stable young couples: Effects of positive engagement, psychological aggression, and withdrawal Journal of Adolescence 2008 31 815 835 18164053 PMC2642009
  23. Lawrence E Bradbury TN Trajectories of change in physical aggression and marital satisfaction Journal of Family Psychology 2007 21 236 247 17605546
  24. MacKinnon DP Introduction to statistical meditation analysis 2008 Psychology Press New York
  25. McLaughlin IG Leonard KE Senchak M Prevalence and distribution of premarital aggression among couples applying for a marriage license Journal of Family Violence 1992 7 309 319
  26. McNulty JK Hellmuth JC Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence in newlyweds Journal of Family Psychology 2008 22 794 797 18855516
  27. O’Leary KD Barling J Arias I Rosenbaum A Malone J Tyree A Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1989 57 263 268 2785126
  28. Quigley BM Leonard KE Desistance of husband aggression in the early years of marriage Violence and Victims 1996 11 355 370 9210277
  29. Raudenbush SW Brennan RT Barnett RC A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples Journal of Family Psychology 1995 9 161 174
  30. Rauer AJ Karney BR Garvan CW Hou W Relationship risks in context: A cumulative risk approach to understanding relationship satisfaction Journal of Marriage and Family 2008 70 1122 1135 19587840 PMC2706520
  31. Sanford K Attributions and anger in early marriage: Wives are event-dependent and husbands are schematic Journal of Family Psychology 2005 19 180 188 15982093
  32. Schoebi D The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships Journal of Family Psychology 2008 22 595 604 18729673
  33. Schumacher JA Leonard KE Husbands’ and wives’ marital adjustment, verbal aggression, and physical aggression as longitudinal predictors of physical aggression in early marriage Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2005 73 28 37 15709829
  34. Shortt JW Capaldi DM Kim HK Owen LD Relationship separation for young, at-risk couples: Prediction from dyadic aggression Journal of Family Psychology 2006 20 624 631 17176197 PMC1764625
  35. Spanier GB Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads Journal of Marriage and the Family 1976 38 15 28
  36. Straus MA Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scale Journal of Marriage and the Family 1979 41 75 88
  37. Straus MA Hamby SL Boney-McCoy S Sugarman DB The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data Journal of Family Issues 1996 17 283 316
  38. Testa M Leonard KE The impact of marital aggression on women’s psychological and marital functioning in a newlywed sample Journal of Family Violence 2001 16 115 130

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Laurent, H. K.
Venue
Partner Abuse
Published
2010-04
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
131-151
ISSN
  • 1946-6560
  • 1946-6579
Cited by
49
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review