The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Differences and Similarities in Pairs of Siblings Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: A Clinical Case Study
Abstract
Although much is known about the effects of intimate partner violence (IPV) on children in general, little is known about sibling differences in adjustment following IPV exposure. The experiences of 2 sibling pairs who participated in an intervention for preschoolers are described using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The 2 sibling pairs illustrate the ways in which exposure to IPV affects children in the same family differently. Although all 4 children experienced fewer posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following intervention, the adjustment of the younger siblings improved more than their older siblings. The older siblings also had more adjustment problems than their younger siblings, both before and after the program. Results suggest that even though children exposed to IPV in the same family may develop problems in adjustment, they may not express their distress or recover from it in the same way.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature makes clear that each child is unique, and the distress caused by exposure to IPV within the home can be expressed differently even among siblings.
“As emphasized throughout this review, the literature makes clear that each child is unique, and the distress caused by exposure to IPV within the home can be expressed differently even among siblings”
From A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE IMPACT OF EXPOSURE TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (2014) · cites this paper as Horn, Hunter, & Graham-Bermann, 2013
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0013977 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10896-009-9299-3 · DOI
- Graham-Bermann S. A. , & Levendosky A. A. (Eds.). (2011). How intimate partner violence affects children: Developmental research, case studies, and evidence-based treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
- 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.199 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0015994 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022897512333 · DOI
- 10.1891/1946-6560.3.3.358 · DOI
- 2010, Partner abuse or violence, parenting and neighborhood influences on children’s behavioral problems, Social Science & Aggression, 70, 1404
- 10.1037/a0022428 · DOI
- 10.1177/0165025406066743 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046822.95464.14 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.324 · DOI
- 10.2307/351733 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/019251396017003001 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, S. R., Hunter, E. C., & Graham-Bermann, S. A.
- ORCID
- Horn, Sarah R.
- Venue
- Partner Abuse
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 274-286
- ISSN
- 1946-6560 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-6579
- OpenAlex
- W2315188081
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Partner Abuse (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, sibling differences, child adjustment, preschool children, post-traumatic stress disorder, family intervention, younger siblings, older siblings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
