Cited by 403Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

New Findings on Alternative Criteria for PTSD in Preschool Children

Open access
SCHEERINGA, MICHAEL S., ZEANAH, CHARLES H., MYERS, LEANN, PUTNAM, FRANK W.·2003·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective An alternative set of criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for preschool children was analyzed for validity.Method Sixty-two traumatized children and 63 healthy controls, aged 20 months through 6 years, were assessed. The traumatic experiences included motor vehicle collisions, accidental injuries, abuse, and witnessing violence. The number of symptoms required for clusters C and D and the utility of proposed symptoms were systematically analyzed.Results No cases met the DSM-IV algorithm for PTSD. Cluster B was endorsed 67.9% of the time. The proportion of cases meeting the cluster C threshold was 2% when three symptoms were required, 11% when two symptoms were required, and 39% when one symptom was required. The rate of cluster D was 45% when two symptoms were required and 73% when one symptom was required. Four novel symptoms did not substantially add to the diagnostic validity of the criteria. The optimal algorithm (one cluster B symptom, one cluster C symptom, and two cluster D symptoms) diagnosed PTSD at a rate of 26%. Measures of comorbid symptoms concurrently provided convergent validation to support this revised algorithm.Conclusion Revisions to the DSM-IV PTSD criteria continue to be supported so that highly symptomatic young children can be diagnosed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.chi.0000046822.95464.14

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SCHEERINGA, M. S., ZEANAH, C. H., MYERS, L., & PUTNAM, F. W.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
SCHEERINGA, MICHAEL S.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
561-570
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069904445
Cited by
403
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
FWCI
19.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (grant K08 MH01706)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, preschool children, PTSD diagnostic criteria, DSM-IV, diagnostic validity, trauma exposure, traffic accidents, child abuse, witnessing violence, comorbid symptoms
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Life Change Events, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review