The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Behavior
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
C. elegans has a behavioral repertoire that is modest compared to most animals and that has been extensively documented.
“C. elegans is among the most thoroughly studied organisms. It has a behavioral repertoire that is modest compared to most animals and that has been extensively documented”
From Understanding Agent Complexity Through Affordances (2025) · cites this paper as Hart, 2006
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hart, Anne
- ORCID
- Hart, Anne
- Venue
- WormBook
- Publisher
- WormBook
- Published
- 2006
- ISSN
- 1551-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4252308397
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- nl
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- WormBook (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- University of California, San Francisco
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- behavior, Caenorhabditis elegans, worm behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
