Cited by 20Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Behavioral response of young rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to forest fire-retardant chemicals in the laboratory

Wells, Jason B., Little, Edward E., Calfee, Robin D.·2004·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

Fire-retardant chemicals often are applied in relatively pristine and environmentally sensitive areas that are potentially inhabited by endangered or threatened aquatic species. Avoidance of contaminants is an adaptive behavior that may reduce exposure to harmful conditions. We evaluated the avoidance responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to concentrations of fire-retardant chemicals and alternate constituent formulations ranging from 0.65 to 26 mg/L. Countercurrent avoidance chambers were used in a flow-through design with receiving water at each end and a drain at the center to create a distinct boundary between treatment water and reference water. Rainbow trout consistently avoided water treated with retardants at all concentrations tested. The magnitude of the avoidance response did not appear to follow a concentration-response relationship, but rather was an all-or-none response.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1897/02-635

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Norris, 1991, Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats, 207
  2. DeLonay, 1996, Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, 268
  3. Little, 1993, Water Quality and the Early Life Stages of Fishes—Symposium 14, 67
  4. Little, 1985, Toxic Substances in the Aquatic Environment: An International Aspect, 72
  5. Beitinger, 1990, Behavioral reactions for the assessment of stress in fishes, J Great Lakes Res, 16, 495, 10.1016/S0380-1330(90)71443-8 · DOI
  6. Calfee, 2003, Effects of a fire-retardant chemical to fathead minnows in experimental streams, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 10, 296, 10.1065/espr2003.03.148 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Calfee, 2003, The effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on the toxicity of fire-fighting chemicals, Environ Toxicol Chem, 22, 1525, 10.1002/etc.5620220714 · DOI
  8. Burdick, 1950, Toxicity of ferro- and ferricyanide solutions to fish and determination of the cause of mortality, Trans Am Fish Soc, 78, 192, 10.1577/1548-8659(1948)78[192:TOFAFS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  9. Cochran, 1957, Experimental Designs
  10. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation., 1989, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
  11. Atchison, 1987, Effects of metals on fish behavior: A review, Environ Biol Fishes, 18, 11, 10.1007/BF00002324 · DOI
  12. Sprague, 1965, Sublethal copper-zinc pollution in a salmon river: A field and laboratory study, Int J Air Water Pollut, 8, 531
  13. Saunders, 1967, Effect of copper-zinc mining pollution on a spawning migration of Atlantic salmon, Water Res, 1, 419, 10.1016/0043-1354(67)90051-6 · DOI
  14. Geckler, 1976, Validity of laboratory tests for predicting copper toxicity in streams
  15. Hartwell, 1989, Toxicity versus avoidance response of golden shiner, Notemigonus crysoleucas, to five metals, J Fish Biol, 35, 447, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb02995.x · DOI
  16. Hansen, 1999, Behavioral avoidance: Possible explanation for explaining abundance and distribution of trout species in a metal-impacted river, Environ Toxicol Chem, 18, 313
  17. Kleerekoper, 1976, Effects of sublethal concentrations of pollutants on the behavior offish, J Fish Res Board Can, 33, 2036
  18. Little, 1983, Fish Neurobiology, 351
  19. Lipton, 1996, Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, 310

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wells, J. B., Little, E. E., & Calfee, R. D.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Little, Edward E.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
621-625
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2101483177
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
rainbow trout, flame retardants, avoidance behavior, chemical contaminants, aquatic toxicology, threatened species, concentration-dependent effects, all-or-none response
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Flame Retardants, Motor Activity, Oncorhynchus mykiss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review