The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavioral response of young rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to forest fire-retardant chemicals in the laboratory
Abstract
Fire-retardant chemicals often are applied in relatively pristine and environmentally sensitive areas that are potentially inhabited by endangered or threatened aquatic species. Avoidance of contaminants is an adaptive behavior that may reduce exposure to harmful conditions. We evaluated the avoidance responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to concentrations of fire-retardant chemicals and alternate constituent formulations ranging from 0.65 to 26 mg/L. Countercurrent avoidance chambers were used in a flow-through design with receiving water at each end and a drain at the center to create a distinct boundary between treatment water and reference water. Rainbow trout consistently avoided water treated with retardants at all concentrations tested. The magnitude of the avoidance response did not appear to follow a concentration-response relationship, but rather was an all-or-none response.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In one study, rainbow trout (O. mykiss) avoided elevated concentrations of fire retardants (Wells et al., 2004), suggesting these chemicals may affect movement and impose metabolic costs.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Wells et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“In one study, rainbow trout (O. mykiss) avoided elevated concentrations of fire retardants (Wells et al., 2004), suggesting these chemicals may affect movement and impose metabolic costs.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Wells et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Norris, 1991, Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats, 207
- DeLonay, 1996, Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, 268
- Little, 1993, Water Quality and the Early Life Stages of Fishes—Symposium 14, 67
- Little, 1985, Toxic Substances in the Aquatic Environment: An International Aspect, 72
- Beitinger, 1990, Behavioral reactions for the assessment of stress in fishes, J Great Lakes Res, 16, 495, 10.1016/S0380-1330(90)71443-8 · DOI
- Calfee, 2003, Effects of a fire-retardant chemical to fathead minnows in experimental streams, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 10, 296, 10.1065/espr2003.03.148 · DOI · Paper page
- Calfee, 2003, The effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on the toxicity of fire-fighting chemicals, Environ Toxicol Chem, 22, 1525, 10.1002/etc.5620220714 · DOI
- Burdick, 1950, Toxicity of ferro- and ferricyanide solutions to fish and determination of the cause of mortality, Trans Am Fish Soc, 78, 192, 10.1577/1548-8659(1948)78[192:TOFAFS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Cochran, 1957, Experimental Designs
- American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation., 1989, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
- Atchison, 1987, Effects of metals on fish behavior: A review, Environ Biol Fishes, 18, 11, 10.1007/BF00002324 · DOI
- Sprague, 1965, Sublethal copper-zinc pollution in a salmon river: A field and laboratory study, Int J Air Water Pollut, 8, 531
- Saunders, 1967, Effect of copper-zinc mining pollution on a spawning migration of Atlantic salmon, Water Res, 1, 419, 10.1016/0043-1354(67)90051-6 · DOI
- Geckler, 1976, Validity of laboratory tests for predicting copper toxicity in streams
- Hartwell, 1989, Toxicity versus avoidance response of golden shiner, Notemigonus crysoleucas, to five metals, J Fish Biol, 35, 447, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb02995.x · DOI
- Hansen, 1999, Behavioral avoidance: Possible explanation for explaining abundance and distribution of trout species in a metal-impacted river, Environ Toxicol Chem, 18, 313
- Kleerekoper, 1976, Effects of sublethal concentrations of pollutants on the behavior offish, J Fish Res Board Can, 33, 2036
- Little, 1983, Fish Neurobiology, 351
- Lipton, 1996, Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, 310
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., & Leibowitz, S. G. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr030699 · Cited by 241
“In one study, rainbow trout (O. mykiss) avoided elevated concentrations of fire retardants (Wells et al., 2004), suggesting these chemicals may affect movement and impose metabolic costs.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wells, J. B., Little, E. E., & Calfee, R. D.
- Affiliations
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Little, Edward E.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-625
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2101483177
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- rainbow trout, flame retardants, avoidance behavior, chemical contaminants, aquatic toxicology, threatened species, concentration-dependent effects, all-or-none response
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Flame Retardants, Motor Activity, Oncorhynchus mykiss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review