The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sorption and degradation of estrogen-like-endocrine disrupting chemicals in soil
Abstract
Studies were undertaken to assess sorption of seven endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), namely, estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2), bisphenol A (BPA), 4-tert-octyl phenol (4-t-OP), and 4-n-nonyl phenol (4-n-NP) on four soils (from sandy to clay soil) with different physicochemical properties and biodegradation of five EDCs (BPA, E2, EE2, 4-t-OP, and 4-n-NP) in a loam soil associated with wastewater reuse. We also characterized the biotransformation of E2 to E1 in the loam soil under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Sorption test using a batch equilibrium method demonstrated that alkylphenols (4-t-OP and 4-n-NP) had the strongest sorption onto soils, followed by estrogens (EE2, E2, E1, E3) and BPA. This laboratory study showed that all five EDCs, including the degradation product E1, were degraded rapidly in the soil within 7 d under aerobic conditions. However, under anaerobic conditions in the soil, little or no degradation of the five EDCs was noted except for E2, which showed slow degradation during the 70-d study. The calculated half-lives for E2 under anaerobic conditions were 24 d in the soil. Estradiol was found to be biotransformed to E1 under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The study suggested that the five EDCs as well as E1, which may be present in reclaimed wastewater, would not persist in well-aerated soil. But these EDCs persisting in anaerobic soil may affect soil and groundwater quality and ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on emerging water contaminants and the application of sustainable removal technologies
Kumar, R., Qureshi, M., Vishwakarma, D. K., Al-Ansari, N., Kuriqi, A., Elbeltagi, A., & Saraswat, A. (2022) · Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100219 · Cited by 498
Jin, Z., Wang, X., Sun, Y., Ai, Y., & Wang, X. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02022 · Cited by 477
Xu, J., Wu, L., & Chang, A. C. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.09.063 · Cited by 396
Fate of Bisphenol A in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments
Im, J., & Löffler, F. E. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00877 · Cited by 305
Removal of organic wastewater contaminants in septic systems using advanced treatment technologies
Wilcox, J. D., Bahr, J. M., Hedman, C. J., Hemming, J. D. C., Barman, M. A. E., & Bradbury, K. R. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0365 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Ying, G.-G., & Kookana, R. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2640-2645
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2015358517
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorption and degradation of estrogen-like-endocrine disrupting chemicals in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1897/05-074r.1
- The paper
- Ying, G.-G., & Kookana, R. S. (2005). Sorption and degradation of estrogen-like-endocrine disrupting chemicals in soil. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1897/05-074r.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.