The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination and fate of oxytetracycline and related compounds in oxytetracycline production wastewater and the receiving river
Abstract
This study investigated the occurrence and fate of oxytetracycline (OTC) and its related substances, 4-epi-oxytetracycline (EOTC), α-apo-oxytetracycline (α-apo-OTC), and β-apo-oxytetracycline (β-apo-OTC), in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) treating OTC production wastewater and a river receiving the effluent from the WWTP using liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS). The percent removal of OTC in the WWTP was 38.0 ± 10.5%, and the concentration of OTC was still up to 19.5 ± 2.9 mg/L in the treated outflow. The concentration slightly decreased along the river, from 641 ± 118 μg/L at site R2 (discharging point) to 377 ± 142 μg/L at site R4 (∼20 km from site R2), which was still higher than the minimal inhibition concentration of OTC reported (∼250 μg/L). On the other hand, the total amount of its related substances in the treated effluent was less than 5% of OTC. Concentrations of α-apo-OTC and β-apo-OTC increased along the river, from 5.76 ± 0.63 and 2.08 ± 0.30 μg/L at site R2 to 11.9 ± 4.9 and 12.0 ± 4.6 μg/L at R4, respectively, although EOTC decreased from 31.5 ± 3.8 to 12.9 ± 1.1 μg/L, respectively. The mean concentration of β-apo-OTC in river sediments was 20.8 ± 7.8 mg/kg, and its ratio to OTC was approximately 0.11, nearly twice the ratio of α-apo-OTC and EOTC to OTC (0.058 ± 0.014 and 0.061 ± 0.015, respectively).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140 · cited 1×
“On the other hand, it has been reported that leaching of antibiotics from excess sludge was also an important pathway into water bodies when the sludge is used as fertilizer on farmlands [25]; however, in this study, the target compounds adsorbed by activated sludge were less than 1% of those discharged into aquatic e…”
Background
Cited by
Imran, M., Das, K. R., & Naik, M. M. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.114 · Cited by 597
Mutuku, C., Gazdag, Z., & Melegh, S. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03334-0 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, D., Yang, M., Hu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-86
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2052189541
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination and fate of oxytetracycline and related compounds in oxytetracycline production wastewater and the receiving river. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1897/07-080.1
- The paper
- Li, D., Yang, M., Hu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, K. (2008). Determination and fate of oxytetracycline and related compounds in oxytetracycline production wastewater and the receiving river. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1897/07-080.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.