The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing the partitioning and toxicity of nanotubes in the aquatic environment
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (NTs) may be among the most useful engineered nanomaterials for structural applications but could be difficult to study in ecotoxicological evaluations using existing tools relative to nanomaterials with a lower aspect ratio. Whereas the hydrophobicity and van der Waals interactions of NTs may suggest aggregation and sedimentation in aquatic systems, consideration regarding how engineered surface modifications influence their environmental fate and toxicology is needed. Surface modifications (e.g., functional groups and coatings) are intended to create conditions to make NTs dispersible in aqueous suspension, as required for some applications. In the present study, column stability and settling experiments indicated that raw, multiwalled NTs (MWNTs) settled more rapidly than carbon black and activated carbon particles, suggesting sediment as the ultimate repository. The presence of functional groups, however, slowed the settling of MWNTs (increasing order of stability: hydroxyl > carboxyl > raw), especially in combination with natural organic matter (NOM). Stabilized MWNTs in high concentrations of NOM provided relevance for water transport and toxicity studies. Aqueous exposures to raw MWNTs decreased Ceriodaphnia dubia viability, but such effects were not observed during exposure to functionalized MWNTs (>80 mg/L). Sediment exposures of the amphipods Leptocheirus plumulosus and Hyalella azteca to different sizes of sediment-borne carbon particles at high concentration indicated mortality increased as particle size decreased, although raw MWNTs induced lower mortality (median lethal concentration [LC50], 50 to >264 g/kg) than carbon black (LC50, 18–40 g/kg) and activated carbon (LC50, 12–29 g/kg). Our findings stress that it may be inappropriate to classify all NTs into one category in terms of their environmental regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization
Chen, R. J., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., & Dai, H. (2001) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja010172b · Cited by 2,534
Cited by
Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R. W., & Nowack, B. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9015553 · Cited by 2,388
Enzymatic Degradation of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes
Zhao, Y., Allen, B. L., & Star, A. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp112324d · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, Hull, M. S., Steevens, J. A., Dontsova, K. M., Chappell, M. A., Gunter, J. C., & Weiss
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1932-1941
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2115471288
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing the partitioning and toxicity of nanotubes in the aquatic environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1897/07-624.1
- The paper
- Kennedy, Hull, M. S., Steevens, J. A., Dontsova, K. M., Chappell, M. A., Gunter, J. C., & Weiss. (2008). Factors influencing the partitioning and toxicity of nanotubes in the aquatic environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1897/07-624.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.