A COMPARISON OF INTERTEACHING AND LECTURE IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM
Open accessAbstract
Interteaching is a new method of classroom instruction that is based on behavioral principles but offers more flexibility than other behaviorally based methods. We examined the effectiveness of interteaching relative to a traditional form of classroom instruction-the lecture. In Study 1, participants in a graduate course in special education took short quizzes after alternating conditions of interteaching and lecture. Quiz scores following interteaching were higher than quiz scores following lecture, although both methods improved performance relative to pretest measures. In Study 2, we also alternated interteaching and lecture but counterbalanced the conditions across two sections of an undergraduate research methods class. After each unit of information, participants from both sections took the same test. Again, test scores following interteaching were higher than test scores following lecture. In addition, students correctly answered more interteaching-based questions than lecture-based questions on a cumulative final test. In both studies, the majority of students reported a preference for interteaching relative to traditional lecture. In sum, the results suggest that interteaching may be an effective alternative to traditional lecture-based methods of instruction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interactive engagement, wherein participants discuss concepts with peers rather than just passively receiving new information, results in dramatically better learning outcomes.
“numerous studies have shown that interactive engagement, wherein participants discuss concepts with peers (rather than just passively receiving new information), resulted in dramatically better learning outcomes.43–45”
From Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t
Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.795 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paliliunas, D., Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2018) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-0252-x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race
Skinner-Dorkenoo, A. L., Rogbeer, K. G., Sarmal, A., Ware, C., & Zhu, J. (2023) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2023.0036 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., Neef, N. A., Norman, R. V., & Ferreri, S. J.
- Affiliations
- James Madison University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saville, Bryan K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-61
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- PMC
- PMC1389610
- OpenAlex
- W2080986302
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 27.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- interteaching, lecture method, classroom teaching, behavioral principles, student performance, student preferences, teaching methods comparison
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Teaching, Universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review