The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES: REINFORCEMENT INTERACTION AND RESPONSE INDEPENDENCE1
Open accessAbstract
When a pigeon's pecks on two keys were reinforced concurrently by two independent variable‐interval (VI) schedules, one for each key, the response rate on either key was given by the equation: R 1 = Kr 1/(r 1 + r 2)5/6, where R is response rate, r is reinforcement rate, and the subscripts 1 and 2 indicate keys 1 and 2. When the constant, K, was determined for a given pigeon in one schedule sequence, the equation predicted that pigeon's response rates in a second schedule sequence. The equation derived from two characteristics of the performance: the total response rate on the two keys was proportional to the one‐sixth power of the total reinforcement rate provided by the two VI schedules; and, the pigeon matched the relative response rate on a key to the relative reinforcement rate for that key. The equation states that response rate on one key depends in part on reinforcement rate for the other key, but implies that it does not depend on response rate on the other key. This independence of response rates on the two keys was demonstrated by presenting a stimulus to the pigeon whenever one key's schedule programmed reinforcement. This maintained the reinforcement rate for that key, but reduced the response rate almost to zero. The response rate on the other key, nevertheless, continued to vary with reinforcement rates according to the equation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957) · doi:10.1037/10627-000 · Cited by 4,894
Cited by
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243 · Cited by 2,611
COMMITMENT, CHOICE AND SELF‐CONTROL1
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15 · Cited by 1,204
Baum, W. M., & Rachlin, H. C. (1969) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861 · Cited by 732
MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICE
William, B. M. (1979) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269 · Cited by 698
PROBABILISTICALLY REINFORCED CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN PIGEONS1
Shimp, C. P. (1966) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Catania, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-263
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- OpenAlex
- W2124216270
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES: REINFORCEMENT INTERACTION AND RESPONSE INDEPENDENCE1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253
- The paper
- Catania, A. C. (1963). CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES: REINFORCEMENT INTERACTION AND RESPONSE INDEPENDENCE1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.