Cited by 1,204Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and Interventions

COMMITMENT, CHOICE AND SELF‐CONTROL1

Open access
Rachlin, Howard, Green, Leonard·1972·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Abstract

When offered a choice (Choice Y) between a small immediate reward (2‐sec exposure to grain) and a large reward (4‐sec exposure to grain) delayed by 4 sec, pigeons invariably preferred the small, immediate reward. However, when offered a choice (Choice X) between a delay of T seconds followed by Choice Y and a delay of T seconds followed by restriction to the large delayed reward only, the pigeon's choice depended on T. When T was small, the pigeons chose the alternative leading to Choice Y (and then chose the small, immediate reward). When T was large, the pigeons chose the alternative leading to the large delayed reward only. The reversal of preference as T increases is predicted by several recent models for choice between various amounts and delays of reward. The preference for the large delayed alternative with long durations of T parallels everyday instances of advance commitment to a given course of action. Such commitment may be seen as a prototype for self‐control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperbolic discounting helps explain violations of the stationarity axiom: preference for larger-later rewards when smaller-sooner rewards are unavailable reverses when the smaller-sooner reward is immediately accessible.

    “The hyperbolic shape of the discounting function also helps to explain the previously mentioned violations of the stationarity axiom in economics (Strotz, 1955); i.e., the tendency to prefer LLRs when SSRs are not readily available, and to reverse this preference when the SSR is immediately accessible.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baum, W. M. and Rachlin, H. Choice as time alloca- tion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Be- havior, 1969, 12, 861-874.
  2. Cooiiubs, C. H. A theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964. P. 201.
  3. Fantino, E. Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimnental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 723-730.
  4. llerrnstein, R. J. Some factors influencing behavior in a tvo-response situation. Transactions of the New York Aca(lemny of Sciences, 1958, 21, 35-45.
  5. Herrnstein, R. J. On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970, 13, 243- 266.
  6. Kanfer, F. H. and Phillips, J. S. Learning foundations of behavior therapy. New York: Wiley, 1970. Pp. 412-413.
  7. Logan, F. A. Decision nmaking by rats: Delay versus amiiount of reward. Joturnal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965, 59, 246-251.
  8. Rachlin, H. and Herrnstein, R. J. Hedonism revisited: On the negative law of effect. In B. Campbell and R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive be- havior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969. Pp. 83-109.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rachlin, H., & Green, L.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Rachlin, Howard
Venue
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
15-22
ISSN
  • 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3711
OpenAlex
W1972850108
Cited by
1,204
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 45
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-control, delay discounting, pigeons, delay duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review