The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND REINFORCEMENT‐FEEDBACK ON HUMAN OPERANT BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY FIXED‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT1
Open accessAbstract
In three experiments, human subjects were trained on a five‐component multiple schedule with different fixed intervals of monetary reinforcement scheduled in the different components. Subjects uninstructed about the fixed‐interval schedules manifested high and generally equivalent rates regardless of the particular component. By comparison, subjects given instructions about the schedules showed orderly progressions of rates and temporal patterning as a function of the interreinforcement intervals, particularly when feedback about reinforcement was delivered but also when reinforcement‐feedback was withheld. Administration of the instructions‐reinforcement combination to subjects who had already developed poorly differentiated behavior, however, did not make their behavior substantially better differentiated. When cost was imposed for responding, both instructed and uninstructed subjects showed low and differentiated rates regardless of their prior histories. It was concluded that instructions can have major influences on the establishment and maintenance of human operant behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
CONTINGENCY‐SHAPED AND RULE‐GOVERNED BEHAVIOR: INSTRUCTIONAL CONTROL OF HUMAN LOSS AVOIDANCE
Galizio, M. (1979) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53 · Cited by 355
UNINSTRUCTED HUMAN RESPONDING: SENSITIVITY OF LOW‐RATE PERFORMANCE TO SCHEDULE CONTINGENCIES
Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1981) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1981.36-207 · Cited by 296
An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans
Solnick, J. V., Kannenberg, C. H., Eckerman, D. A., & Waller, M. B. (1980) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Stauber, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 701-712
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- OpenAlex
- W2065884108
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND REINFORCEMENT‐FEEDBACK ON HUMAN OPERANT BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY FIXED‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-701
- The paper
- Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Stauber, K. A. (1969). EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND REINFORCEMENT‐FEEDBACK ON HUMAN OPERANT BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY FIXED‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.