The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Whitfield, J. W., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342828 · Cited by 7,947
Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708
COMMITMENT, CHOICE AND SELF‐CONTROL1
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15 · Cited by 1,204
Ainslie, G. W. (1974) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485 · Cited by 759
Baum, W. M., & Rachlin, H. C. (1969) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861 · Cited by 732
CHOICE AND RATE OF REINFORCEMENT1,2
Fantino, E. (1969) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723 · Cited by 510
UNINSTRUCTED HUMAN REPONDING: SENSITIVITY TO RATIO AND INTERVAL CONTINGENCIES1
Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453 · Cited by 349
Self-control and general models of choice.
Navarick, D. J., & Fantino, E. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037//0097-7403.2.1.75 · Cited by 253
REINFORCEMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS WITH MENTAL PATIENTS1
Ayllón, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1964) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-327 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers
Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/pl00005490 · Cited by 1,433
Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes
Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961736.x · Cited by 1,117
A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures
Duckworth, A. L., & Kern, M. L. (2011) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.004 · Cited by 1,031
Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.5.3.256 · Cited by 911
Research on self-control: An integrating framework
Logue, A. W. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00053978 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Solnick, J. V., Kannenberg, C. H., Eckerman, D. A., & Waller, M. B.
- Venue
- Learning and Motivation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-77
- ISSN
- 0023-9690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019711724
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1
- The paper
- Solnick, J. V., Kannenberg, C. H., Eckerman, D. A., & Waller, M. B. (1980). An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. Learning and Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.