The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONCURRENT RESPONDING WITH FIXED RELATIVE RATE OF REINFORCEMENT1
Open accessAbstract
Responding by pigeons on one key of a two‐key chamber alternated the color of the second key, on which responding produced food according to a variable‐interval schedule of reinforcement. From time to time, reinforcement would be available for a response, but in the presence of a particular stimulus, either red or green light on the key. Red or green was chosen irregularly from reinforcement to reinforcement, so that a proportion of the total number of reinforcements could be specified for each color. Experimental manipulations involved variations of (1) the proportions for each color, (2) changeover delay, or, alternatively, (3) a fixed‐ratio changeover requirement. The main findings were: (1) relative overall rates of responding and relative times in the presence of a key color approximated the proportions of reinforcements obtained in the presence of that color, while relative local rates of responding changed little; (2) changeover rate decreased as the proportions diverged from 0.50; (3) relative overall rate of responding and relative time remained constant as the changeover delay was increased from 2 to 32 sec, with reinforcement proportions for red and green of 0.75 and 0.25, but they increased above 0.90 when a fixed‐ratio changeover of 20 responses replaced the changeover delay; (4) changeover rate decreased as the delay or fixed‐ratio was increased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROBABILISTICALLY REINFORCED CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN PIGEONS1
Shimp, C. P. (1966) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443 · Cited by 257
Cited by
ON TWO TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM THE MATCHING LAW: BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING 1
Baum, W. M. (1974) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231 · Cited by 1,460
Research on self-control: An integrating framework
Logue, A. W. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00053978 · Cited by 792
MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICE
William, B. M. (1979) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269 · Cited by 698
Melioration and Behavioral Allocation
Herrnstein, R. J., & Vaughan, W. (1980) · Limits to Action · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-662650-6.50011-8 · Cited by 280
Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.
Mazur, J. E. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.96 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Stubbs, D. A., & Pliskoff, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 887-895
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- OpenAlex
- W1972405615
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONCURRENT RESPONDING WITH FIXED RELATIVE RATE OF REINFORCEMENT1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887
- The paper
- Stubbs, D. A., & Pliskoff, S. S. (1969). CONCURRENT RESPONDING WITH FIXED RELATIVE RATE OF REINFORCEMENT1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.