Cited by 187Behavioral and Psychological StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

REPLACING RELATIVE REINFORCING EFFICACY WITH BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC DEMAND CURVES

Open access
Johnson, Matthew W., Bickel, Warren K.·2006·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Abstract

Relative reinforcing efficacy refers to the behavior‐strengthening or maintaining property of a reinforcer when compared to that of another reinforcer. Traditional measures of relative reinforcing efficacy sometimes have led to discordant results across and within studies. By contrast, previous investigations have found traditional measures to be congruent with behavioral economic measures, which provide a framework for integrating the discordant results. This study tested whether the previously demonstrated congruence between traditional relative reinforcing efficacy measures and behavioral economic demand curve measures is sufficiently robust to persist when demand for one reinforcer is altered. Cigarette smokers pulled plungers for cigarettes or two magnitudes of money on progressive‐ratio schedules that increased the response requirement across sessions. Demand for the two different reinforcers was assessed in single‐schedule and concurrent‐schedule sessions. Demand curve measures P max and O max correlated significantly with traditional measures of breakpoint and peak response rate, respectively. Relative locations of demand curves for money and cigarettes under single schedules predicted preference in concurrent schedules in most cases. Although measures of relative reinforcing efficacy for money changed with money magnitude, the congruence between traditional and behavioral economic measures remained intact. This robust congruence supports the proposal that demand curves should replace measures of relative reinforcing efficacy. The demand curve analysis illustrates why concordance between traditional measures is expected under some experimental conditions but not others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jeab.2006.102-04

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Matthew W.
Venue
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
73-93
ISSN
  • 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3711
OpenAlex
W2133598799
Cited by
187
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R37DA06526, R37DA006526, T32DA007242)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
demand curve, behavioral economics, reinforcer preference, concurrent schedules, progressive ratio schedule, cigarette smoking, Pmax, OMAX, breakpoints, reinforcement magnitude
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Conditioning, Operant, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Psychomotor Performance, Reinforcement Schedule, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review