Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship of Oral Malodor to Periodontitis: Evidence of Independence in Discrete Subpopulations

Bosy, A., Kulkarni, G. V., Rosenberg, M., McCulloch, C.A.G.·1994·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

A ssociations between oral malodor, measures of periodontal disease, and trypsinlike activity of periodontal pathogens on tongue and teeth were examined in 127 subjects. Volatile sulphur compound (VSC) measurements were made with a portable sulphide monitor; oral malodor was also estimated by organoleptic methods. Measurements repeated one week apart indicated that steady‐state VSC levels (r = 0.72; P = 0.0001) and peak VSC levels (r = 0.63; P = 0.0001) were reproducible but these r values were not significantly different (P >0.1). There was a significant correlation between tongue odor and peak VSC levels (r = 0.40; P = 0.0001) and between tongue odor and whole mouth organoleptic measures (r = 0.55; P = 0.0001). To study the effect of reducing microbial colonization on oral malodor, chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2%) rinsing was prescribed for 7 days. Reductions of VSC levels were significant for both peak (37%) and steady‐state (41%) data (P = 0.0001). Anaerobic periodontal pathogens on the tongue estimated by the proportions of positive BANA tests were reduced 19% (P = 0.001) and this was concomitant with a 40% (P = 0.0001) decrease in organoleptic measurement of the tongue dorsum. Mean pH measurements of the tongue dorsum showed large reductions from 6.9 initially to 6.3 post‐treatment (P = 0.0001). Subjects were divided into periodontitis/no periodontitis based on periodontal inflammation and probing depth (≥5 mm). Of the 37 subjects with periodontitis, 23 had oral malodor whereas 52 out of 90 periodontally healthy subjects exhibited malodor. Chi square analysis comparing halitosis in subjects with and without periodontitis showed no statistically significant association (X 2 = 0.208; P 0.65) between these two factors although the intensity of malodor as based on VSC concentration in periodontally healthy subjects was 19% less (mean = 111 ppb) than in subjects with periodontitis (mean = 136 ppb). The odds ratio was 1.2, indicating that oral malodor was not associated with periodontitis. These data indicate that a large proportion of individuals with oral malodor are periodontally healthy and that the mucosal surface of the tongue is a major site of oral malodor production. J Periodontol 1994;65:37–46.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.1994.65.1.37

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Bosy, A., Kulkarni, G. V., Rosenberg, M., & McCulloch, C. A. G.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
37-46
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2035915954
Cited by
297
References
2
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship of Oral Malodor to Periodontitis: Evidence of Independence in Discrete Subpopulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.1994.65.1.37
The paper
Bosy, A., Kulkarni, G. V., Rosenberg, M., & McCulloch, C. A. G. (1994). Relationship of Oral Malodor to Periodontitis: Evidence of Independence in Discrete Subpopulations. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.1.37

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.