The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long‐Term Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy: I. Response to 4 Therapeutic Modalities
Abstract
E ighty‐two periodontal patients were treated in a split mouth design with coronal scaling (CS), root planing (RP), modified Widman surgery (MW), and flap with osseous resection surgery (FO) which were randomly assigned to various quadrants in the dentition. Therapy was performed in 3 phases: non‐surgical, surgical, and supportive periodontal treatment (SPT) ≤ 7 years. Clinical data consisted of probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (REC), bleeding on probing (BOP), suppuration (SUP), and supragingival plaque (PL). Because of the necessity to exit many CS treated sites due to breakdown, data for CS were reported only up to 2 years. All therapies produced mean PD reduction with FO > MW > RP > CS following the surgical phase for all probing depth severities. By the end of year 2 there were no differences between the therapies in the 1 to 4 mm sites. There were no differences in PD reduction between MW and RP treated sites by the end of year 3 in the 5 to 6 mm sites and by the end of year 5 in the ≥ 7 mm sites. FO produced greater PD reduction in ≥ 5 mm sites through year 7 of SPT. Following the surgical phase, FO produced a mean CAL loss and CS and RP produced a slight gain in 1–4 mm sites. RP and MW produced a greater gain of CAL than CS and FO following the surgical phase in 5 to 6 mm sites, but the magnitude of difference decreased during SPT. Similar CAL gains were produced by RP, MW, and FO in sites ≥ 7 mm. These gains were greater than that produced by CS and were sustained during SPT. Recession was produced with FO > MW > RP > CS. This relationship was maintained throughout SPT. The prevalences of BOP, SUP, and PL were greatly reduced throughout the study and were comparable between sites treated by RP, MW, and FO while the CS sites had more BOP and SUP. J Periodontol 1996;67:93–102.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Indicators for Future Clinical Attachment Loss in Adult Periodontitis. Tooth and Site Variables
Grbic, J. T., & Lamster, I. B. (1992) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1992.63.4.262 · Cited by 65
Cited by
Kinane, D. F., Stathopoulou, P. G., & Papapanou, P. N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.38 · Cited by 2,724
Cobb, C. M. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s2.4.x · Cited by 566
Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A., Trombelli, L., Heitz, F., Needleman, I., & Moles, D. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.5.x · Cited by 455
Surgical and nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Learned and unlearned concepts
Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A., & Lang, N. P. (2013) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12008 · Cited by 336
Antimicrobial effects of mechanical debridement
PETERSILKA, G. J., EHMKE, B., & FLEMMIG, T. F. (2002) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280103.x · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaldahl, W. B., Kalkwarf, K. L., Patil, K. D., Molvar, M. P., & Dyer, J. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-102
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2018596791
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy: I. Response to 4 Therapeutic Modalities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.93
- The paper
- Kaldahl, W. B., Kalkwarf, K. L., Patil, K. D., Molvar, M. P., & Dyer, J. K. (1996). Long‐Term Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy: I. Response to 4 Therapeutic Modalities. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.