The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Inter‐Implant Distance on the Height of Inter‐Implant Bone Crest
Abstract
Background: The biologic width around implants has been well documented in the literature. Once an implant is uncovered, vertical bone loss of 1.5 to 2 mm is evidenced apical to the newly established implant‐abutment interface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lateral dimension of the bone loss at the implant‐abutment interface and to determine if this lateral dimension has an effect on the height of the crest of bone between adjacent implants separated by different distances. Methods: Radiographic measurements were taken in 36 patients who had 2 adjacent implants present. Lateral bone loss was measured from the crest of bone to the implant surface. In addition, the crestal bone loss was also measured from a line drawn between the tops of the adjacent implants. The data were divided into 2 groups, based on the inter‐implant distance at the implant shoulder. Results: The results demonstrated that the lateral bone loss was 1.34 mm from the mesial implant shoulder and 1.40 mm from the distal implant shoulder between the adjacent implants. In addition, the crestal bone loss for implants with a greater than 3 mm distance between them was 0.45 mm, while the implants that had a distance of 3 mm or less between them had a crestal bone loss of 1.04 mm. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is a lateral component to the bone loss around implants in addition to the more commonly discussed vertical component. The clinical significance of this phenomenon is that the increased crestal bone loss would result in an increase in the distance between the base of the contact point of the adjacent crowns and the crest of bone. This could determine whether the papilla was present or absent between 2 implants as has previously been reported between 2 teeth. Selective utilization of implants with a smaller diameter at the implant‐abutment interface may be beneficial when multiple implants are to be placed in the esthetic zone so that a minimum of 3 mm of bone can be retained between them at the implant‐abutment level. J Periodontol 2000;71:546‐549.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dimensions and Relations of the Dentogingival Junction in Humans
Gargiulo, A. W., Wentz, F. M., & Orban, B. (1961) · The Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261 · Cited by 1,053
Human gingival attachment responses to subgingival crown placement Marginal remodelling
Tarnow, D., Stahl, S. S., Magner, A., & Zamzok, J. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00848.x · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Cited by
Choquet, V., Hermans, M., Adriaenssens, P., Daelemans, P., Tarnow, D. P., & Malevez, C. (2001) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1364 · Cited by 469
Self-citationThe biological width around implant
Zheng, Z., Ao, X., Xie, P., Jiang, F., & Chen, W. (2021) · Journal of Prosthodontic Research · doi:10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_356 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarnow, D. P., Cho, S. C., & Wallace, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 546-549
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2151152289
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Inter‐Implant Distance on the Height of Inter‐Implant Bone Crest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546
- The paper
- Tarnow, D. P., Cho, S. C., & Wallace, S. S. (2000). The Effect of Inter‐Implant Distance on the Height of Inter‐Implant Bone Crest. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.