Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Papilla Level Adjacent to Single‐Tooth Dental Implants. A Retrospective Study in the Maxillary Anterior Region

Choquet, Vincent, Hermans, Marc, Adriaenssens, Philippe, Daelemans, Philippe, Tarnow, Dennis P., Malevez, Chantal·2001·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: The regeneration of gingival papillae after single‐implant treatment is an area of current investigation. This study was designed to determine: 1) whether the distance from the base of the contact point to the crest of the bone would correlate with the presence or absence of interproximal papillae adjacent to single‐tooth implants, and 2) whether the surgical technique at uncovering influences the outcome. Methods: A clinical and radiographic retrospective evaluation of the papilla level around single dental implants and their adjacent teeth was performed in the anterior maxilla in 26 patients restored with 27 implants. Six months after insertion, 17 implants were uncovered with a standard technique, while 10 implants were uncovered with a technique designed to generate papilla‐like formation around dental implants. Fifty‐two papillae were available for clinical and radiographic evaluation. The presence or absence of papillae was determined, and the effects of the following variables were analyzed: the influence of the 2 surgical techniques; the vertical relation between the papilla height and the crest of bone between the implant and adjacent teeth; the vertical relation between the papilla level and the contact point between the crowns of the teeth and the implant; and the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone. Results: When the measurement from the contact point to the crest of bone was 5 mm or less, the papilla was present almost 100% of the time. When the distance was ≥6 mm, the papilla was present 50% of the time or less. The mean distance between the crest of bone and the most coronal papilla level (interproximal soft tissue height) was 3.85 mm (SD = 1.04). When comparing the conventional and modified surgical technique, the relation shifted from 3.77 mm (SD = 1.01) to 4.01 mm (SD = 1.10), respectively. Conclusions: These results clearly show the influence of the bone crest on the presence or absence of papillae between implants and adjacent teeth. The data also show a positive influence for the modified surgical technique, aimed at reconstructing papillae at the implant uncovering. J Periodontol 2001;72:1364‐1371.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1364

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Choquet, V., Hermans, M., Adriaenssens, P., Daelemans, P., Tarnow, D. P., & Malevez, C.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-10
Volume
72
Issue
10
Pages
1364-1371
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2091996078
Cited by
469
References
14
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Papilla Level Adjacent to Single‐Tooth Dental Implants. A Retrospective Study in the Maxillary Anterior Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1364
The paper
Choquet, V., Hermans, M., Adriaenssens, P., Daelemans, P., Tarnow, D. P., & Malevez, C. (2001). Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Papilla Level Adjacent to Single‐Tooth Dental Implants. A Retrospective Study in the Maxillary Anterior Region. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1364

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.