The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and Predictive Factors for Peri‐Implant Disease and Implant Failure: A Cross‐Sectional Analysis
Abstract
Background: Long‐term studies worldwide indicate that peri‐implant inflammation is a frequent finding and that the prevalence of peri‐implantitis correlates with loading time. Implant loss, although less frequent, has serious oral health and economic consequences. An understanding of predictive factors for peri‐implant disease and implant loss would help providers and patients make informed decisions. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was performed on 96 patients with 225 implants that were placed between 1998 and 2003. Implant placement data were collected from patient records, and patients presented for a clinical and radiographic follow‐up examination. Implant status and periodontal status were determined, the data were analyzed to determine the prevalence of peri‐implant disease or implant loss, and a predictive model was tested. Results: The mean follow‐up time for the patients was 10.9 years. The implant survival rate was 91.6%. Peri‐implant mucositis was found in 33% of the implants and 48% of the patients, and peri‐implantitis occurred in 16% of the implants and 26% of the patients. Individuals with peri‐implantitis were twice as likely to report a problem with an implant as individuals with healthy implants. Peri‐implantitis is associated with younger ages and diabetes at the time of placement and with periodontal status at the time of follow‐up. Implant loss is associated with diabetes, immediate placement, and larger‐diameter implants. Conclusions: One in four patients and one in six implants have peri‐implantitis after 11 years. The data suggest that periodontal and diabetes status of the patient may be useful for predicting implant outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schwarz, F., Derks, J., Monje, A., & Wang, H. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12954 · Cited by 1,066
Schwarz, F., Derks, J., Monje, A., & Wang, H. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.16-0350 · Cited by 723
Renvert, S., Persson, G. R., Pirih, F. Q., & Camargo, P. M. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12956 · Cited by 573
Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis
Lee, C.-T., Huang, Y.-W., Zhu, L., & Weltman, R. (2017) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011 · Cited by 538
Epidemiology and risk factors of peri‐implantitis: A systematic review
Dreyer, H., Grischke, J., Tiede, C., Eberhard, J., Schweitzer, A., Toikkanen, S. E., Glöckner, S., Krause, G., & Stiesch, M. (2018) · Journal of Periodontal Research · doi:10.1111/jre.12562 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Daubert, D. M., Weinstein, B. F., Bordin, S., Leroux, B. G., & Flemmig, T. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-347
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2172130088
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Predictive Factors for Peri‐Implant Disease and Implant Failure: A Cross‐Sectional Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2014.140438
- The paper
- Daubert, D. M., Weinstein, B. F., Bordin, S., Leroux, B. G., & Flemmig, T. F. (2015). Prevalence and Predictive Factors for Peri‐Implant Disease and Implant Failure: A Cross‐Sectional Analysis. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.