Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Indicators for Periodontitis in US Adults: NHANES 2009 to 2012

Open access
Eke, Paul I., Wei, Liang, Thornton‐Evans, Gina O., Borrell, Luisa N., Borgnakke, Wenche S., Dye, Bruce, Genco, Robert J.·2016·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: Through the use of optimal surveillance measures and standard case definitions, it is now possible to more accurately determine population‐average risk profiles for severe (SP) and non‐severe periodontitis (NSP) in adults (aged 30 years and older) in the United States. Methods: Data from the 2009 to 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used, which, for the first time, used the “gold standard” full‐mouth periodontitis surveillance protocol to classify severity of periodontitis following suggested Centers for Disease Control/American Academy of Periodontology case definitions. Probabilities of periodontitis by: 1) sociodemographics, 2) behavioral factors, and 3) comorbid conditions were assessed using prevalence ratios (PRs) estimated by predicted marginal probability from multivariable generalized logistic regression models. Analyses were further stratified by sex for each classification of periodontitis. Results: Likelihood of total periodontitis (TP) increased with age for overall and NSP relative to non‐periodontitis. Compared with non‐Hispanic whites, TP was more likely in Hispanics (adjusted [a]PR = 1.38; 95% confidence interval 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.52) and non‐Hispanic blacks (aPR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.50), whereas SP was most likely in non‐Hispanic blacks (aPR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.31). There was at least a 50% greater likelihood of TP in current smokers compared with non‐smokers. In males, likelihood of TP in adults aged 65 years and older was greater (aPR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.76 to 2.43) than adults aged 30 to 44 years. This probability was even greater in women (aPR = 3.15; 95% CI: 2.63 to 3.77). Likelihood of TP was higher in current smokers relative to non‐smokers regardless of sex and periodontitis classification. TP was more likely in men with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) compared with adults without DM. Conclusions: Assessment of risk profiles for periodontitis in adults in the United States based on gold standard periodontal measures show important differences by severity of disease and sex. Cigarette smoking, specifically current smoking, remains an important modifiable risk for all levels of periodontitis severity. Higher likelihood of TP in older adults and in males with uncontrolled DM is noteworthy. These findings could improve identification of target populations for effective public health interventions to improve periodontal health of adults in the United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2016.160013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Eke, P. I., Wei, L., Thornton‐Evans, G. O., Borrell, L. N., Borgnakke, W. S., Dye, B., & Genco, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10
Volume
87
Issue
10
Pages
1174-1185
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2525195380
Cited by
216
References
1
FWCI
36.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Indicators for Periodontitis in US Adults: NHANES 2009 to 2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2016.160013
The paper
Eke, P. I., Wei, L., Thornton‐Evans, G. O., Borrell, L. N., Borgnakke, W. S., Dye, B., & Genco, R. J. (2016). Risk Indicators for Periodontitis in US Adults: NHANES 2009 to 2012. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.