CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 258Educational Games and GamificationInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesProblem and Project Based Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increasing Student Intrinsic Motivation And Self-Efficacy Through Gamification Pedagogy

Banfield, James, Wilkerson, Brad·2014·Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER)
DOI 10.19030/cier.v7i4.8843
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess gamification as a method of experiential learning theory (ELT) on student motivation and self-efficacy to perform System Engineering/Information Assurance (IA) tasks. The study was a basic qualitative method, whereby data was collected via semi-structured interview and then analyzed for recurring themes and patterns. The students involved in the study were undergraduate students enrolled in system administration and security courses. We introduced ELT in early stages of curriculum in place of commonly used didactic methods of delivering theory. We compared the themes found in increased ELT classes with past didactic sections of the same courses. Data analysis revealed that increasing ELT in IA coursework at all levels of the curriculum increased both student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. This paper outlines gamification pedagogy used in 200 and 300 level postsecondary courses of system administration. Gathered results indicated high intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy from the students 96 interviewed. The paper will also present examples of gamification ELT lessons at each level of undergraduate study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19030/cier.v7i4.8843

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–257 of 257

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Banfield, J., & Wilkerson, B.
Affiliations
Eastern Michigan University (US)
Venue
Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER)
Publisher
Clute Institute
Published
2014-09-16
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
291-298
ISSN
  • 1940-5847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-756X
DOI
10.19030/cier.v7i4.8843
OpenAlex
W2124096951
Cited by
258
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
24.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
gamification, experiential learning theory, intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, information assurance, undergraduate students, curriculum development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review