Cited by 4Amazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryHistorical Studies in Central AmericaArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tunja prehispánica

Argüello García, Pedro María·2023

Abstract

Este libro expone los resultados de un reconocimiento regional sistemático en un área de 277 Km² que incluyó parte de los actuales municipios de Tunja, Motavita, Cómbita, Oicatá, Chivatá, Boyacá, Samacá, Sora y Cucaita, (Boyacá-Colombia). Su objetivo fue aportar en la comprensión del origen y desarrollo del cacicazgo de Tunja, descrito por los españoles en el siglo XVI como uno de los dos más grandes en el altiplano cundiboyacense, mediante el análisis de los patrones de asentamiento prehispánico. Los resultados problematizan la tradicional imagen sobre los grandes y poderosos cacicazgos muiscas y abren nuevas vías de análisis respecto a la naturaleza de los procesos de complejización social en esta área del país.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19053/9789586607940

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Argüello García, P. M.
Affiliations
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Published
2023
OpenAlex
W4388709498
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
book
Language
es
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
Muisca, social complexity, Cundiboyacense highlands, Boyacá, regional survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review