Cited by 30Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsHealth, Medicine and SocietyMedical and Health Sciences Research

No longer 'anomalous, confusing and unjust': the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016

Open access
Harper, Colin, Davidson, Gavin, McClelland, Roy·2017·International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law

Abstract

Since 2002 there has been a broad and extensive process to develop new legislation relating to mental health and mental capacity which is of interest as it represents a new departure in terms of such legislation. The Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 legislates a fusion approach to mental capacity/mental health law. The provisions of the Act apply in general to people who are aged 16 and over and it goes beyond a proposed ‘model law’ of the fusion type in that it incorporates criminal justice provisions. This article provides an overview of the process of development of the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016. The Act has its origins in the Recommendations of the Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability which are considered first. The publication of these recommendations was followed by an extended policy development process which is discussed next. Following an overview of the contents of the Act, key issues which emerged during the policy development and legislative processes are outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19164/ijmhcl.v2016i22.552

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability (2006). Human Rights and Equality of Opportunity. Belfast: DHSSPS.
  2. Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability (2007). A Comprehensive Legal Framework for Mental Health and Learning Disability. Belfast: DHSSPS.
  3. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (2008). Delivering the Bamford Vision: the Response of Northern Ireland Executive to the Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability. Draft for Consultation. Belfast: DHSSPS.
  4. Dickson, B. (2013). Law in Northern Ireland. 2 nd Edition. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
  5. Flynn, E. (2013) 'Mental (in)capacity or legal capacity? A human rights analysis of the proposed fusion of mental health and mental capacity in Northern Ireland'. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 64(4), 485.
  6. Lewis, O. (2011). Advancing legal capacity jurisprudence. European Human Rights Law Review 6: 700-714.
  7. Szmukler, G., Daw, R. & Dawson, J. (2010). A model law fusing incapacity and mental health legislation. Journal of Mental Health Law 20: 9-22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harper, C., Davidson, G., & McClelland, R.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law
Published
2017-02-17
Issue
22
Pages
57-70
ISSN
2056-3922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538821618
Cited by
30
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
Keywords
mental capacity law, mental health law, learning disabilities, legislative process, policy development, Northern Ireland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review