Cited by 3Helminth infection and controlVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchParasite Biology and Host Interactions

Localisation des parasites dans l'estomac du cheval de la région de Settat (Maroc)

Open access
Ouhelli, H., Cabaret, J., Pandey, V.S., Elkhalfane, A.·1979·Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux

Abstract

L'examen de quatre-vingt-seize estomacs de chevaux originaires de la région de Settat (Maroc) a été réalisé d'octobre 1977 à septembre 1978. Chaque espèce parasitaire présente une niche particulière dans l'estomac. Ainsi Gasterophilus intestinalis est localisé essentiellement sur la muqueuse osophagienne de l'estomac et Gasterophilus nasalis sur la muqueuse pylorique Trichostrongylus axei est particulièrement rencontré sur la muqueuse fundique et Habronema spp. sur la muqueuse pylorique. En règle générale, les densités élevées d'un genre parasite provoquent une extension de sa niche écologique au contraire les densités élevées des autres genres concurrents imposent un retrait vers la niche habituelle

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19182/remvt.8125

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At larval and adult stages these species live in the stomach of domestic and wild equids.

    “The adults of all three species (Habronema muscae, H. microstoma and D. megastoma) live in the stomach wall of the gastric fundus and pyloric valve or freely on the mucosal surface of the margo plicatus (8).”

    From Habronematidosis in Equids: Current Status, Advances, Future Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) places Habronema spp. on the fundic and pyloric mucosa, supporting the printed sentence’s broad claim that these parasites occur in those stomach regions. It does not establish the stated locations for all three named species: the passages do not identify D. megastoma or describe the stomach wall, pyloric valve, or margo plicatus. The supplied paraphrase also extends the finding to wild equids, whereas Materials and Methods (page unavailable) describes only horses from Settat. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. ALPHEY o'.). Studios on the aggregation behwiour of Nipposlrongylus brasiliensis. Parasitology, 1971, 63 : 109-117.
  2. CROFTON (H. D.). A quantitative approach to parasitism. Parasilology, 1971, 62 : 118-193.
  3. DtiET (J.j, LECORDIER (C.), LEV@.QUE (L.). Notion de nomocénose : ses applications en écologie. Bull. Soc. Ecol., 1973, 3 (4) : 448.462.
  4. IWAO (S.), KUNO (E.). Use of regrcssion of mean crowding on mean density for estimating sample size and the transformation of data for the analysis of variame. Res. Pop. Em/., 1968, 10 : 210-214.
  5. LAGAUTERIE (P.), LEROUX (P.). Une méthode d'analyse de la sensibilité aux facteurs ambiants des macr&nvertébrés benthiques des eaux courantes. Terre Vie, 1977, 31 (2) : 327-342.
  6. II. LEWIS fJ.), BRYANT (U.). Tbe distribution of Nemotospiroides dubiw within the small intestine of laboratory mice. J. Helminth., 1976, 50 (3) : 163- 171 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
  7. ffiBOURNE (C. P.). The prevalence, relative abundance and site distribution of Nematoden of the subfamily Cyathosrominae in horses killed in Britain. J. Helminth., 1976,50 (3) : 203-214.
  8. ROSS (J. G.), PURNELL (D. A.), TODD (J. R.). Experimental infection of lambs with Tri- chmf,ongy/t~s axei. Res. WL Sd., 1969, 10 : 142.147.
  9. SOMMERVILLE (R. 1.). Distribution of some parasitic nematodes in the alimentay tract of sheep, cattle and rabbits. 3. Paru.vif., 1963, 49 : 593-599.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouhelli, H., Cabaret, J., Pandey, V. S., & Elkhalfane, A.
Venue
Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux
Published
1979-04-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
347
ISSN
  • 0035-1865 (ISSN-L)
  • 1951-6711
OpenAlex
W2414002597
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Keywords
Gasterophilus intestinalis, Gasterophilus nasalis, Trichostrongylus axei, Habronema, gastric mucosa, ecological niche, parasite density, horse parasites
MeSH terms
Animals, Diptera, Female, Horses, Larva, Male, Spiruroidea, Stomach, Trichostrongyloidea, Spirurida Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review