The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between product market competition (PMC) and innovation. A Schumpeterian growth model is developed in which firms innovate ѳtep-by-stepҬ and where both technological leaders and their followers engage in R&D activities. In this model, competition may increase the incremental profit from innovating; on the other hand, competition may also reduce innovation incentives for laggards. This model generates four main predictions which we test empirically. First, the relationship between product market competition (PMC) and innovation is an inverted U-shape: the escape competition effect dominates for low initial levels of competition, whereas the Schumpeterian effect dominates at higher levels of competition. Second, the equilibrium degree of technological Ѯeck-and-neckness' among firms should decrease with PMC. Third, the higher the average degree of Ѯeck-and-neckness' in an industry, the steeper the inverted-U relationship between PMC and innovation in that industry. Fourth, firms may innovate more if subject to higher debt-pressure, especially at lower levels of PMC. We confront these four predictions with a new panel data set on UK firms' patenting activity at the US patenting office. The inverted U relationship, the neck and neck, and the debt pressure predictions are found to accord well with observed behavior in the data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,303
Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots
Cleveland, W. S. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 · Cited by 11,594
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Arrow, K. J. (1962) · The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity · doi:10.1515/9781400879762-024 · Cited by 8,635
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OPTIMUM PRODUCT DIVERSITY
Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J. E., Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1975) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.268957 · Cited by 7,391
Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy.
Taylor, M. S., Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1993) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2554862 · Cited by 6,231
Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey
Griliches, Z. (1990) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3301 · Cited by 5,828
A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1990) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3223 · Cited by 5,634
Self-citationOptimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification
Townsend, R. M. (1979) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90031-0 · Cited by 3,204
Howitt, P. (2018) · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2545 · Cited by 2,780
Self-citationApplied nonparametric regression
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-0364 · Cited by 2,580
Cited by
Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?
FANG, V. W., TIAN, X., & TICE, S. (2014) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12187 · Cited by 1,339
The Economics of Two-Sided Markets
Rysman, M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.23.3.125 · Cited by 1,261
Does banking competition affect innovation?
Cornaggia, J., Mao, Y., Tian, X., & Wolfe, B. (2015) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.001 · Cited by 1,051
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. M. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.922368 · Cited by 836
Self-citationBoudreau, K. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Blundell, R., Howitt, P., Griffith, R., Aghion, P., & Bloom, N.
- Venue
- Working Paper Series
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
- Published
- 2002-02-02
- ISSN
- 1742-0415
- OpenAlex
- W3122980858
- Cited by
- 2,109
- References
- 46
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1920/wp.ifs.2002.0204
- The paper
- Blundell, R., Howitt, P., Griffith, R., Aghion, P., & Bloom, N. (2002). Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship. Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2002.0204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.