The Fight Against Greenwashing in the European Union: Directive (EU) 2024/825 of the European Parliament and the Council, of February 28, 2024, and the Portuguese Case
Open accessAbstract
In contemporary society, issues of environmental protection are a constant concern and can challenge acquired habits, as well as the acquisition of goods and products. Thus, the consumer is called to have an active and proactive role in sustainable development, as their choices, to a certain extent, will focus on goods and services that are less harmful to the environment.It is certain that humans, as consumers, need to acquire goods and services to meet their essential needs and, in this sense, play a primordial role in the development of the economic and commercial circuit, aiming to address their deficiencies. To do so, they need true, reliable information about the products and services they intend to acquire so that they are sustainable and less harmful to the environment.However, in commercial relations between professionals and consumers, advertising practices are used by economic agents to claim that their products, goods, and services are the least harmful to the environment. This is where greenwashing comes in, which is nothing more than a false environmental claim aimed at suggesting or giving the impression, through advertising or marketing campaigns, that a certain product, good, or service has a less harmful environmental impact. But, in reality, such environmental claims are unfounded, inaccurate, incorrect, or even false.Following the European Green Deal, around the circular economy, there is a concern by the European Union in combating greenwashing practices, ecological bleaching, or eco-bleaching. In this fight, the Directive (EU) 2024/825 of the European Parliament and the Council, of February 28, 2024, emerges, aiming to combat unfair commercial practices that prevent consumers from making the most sustainable choices for the environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ECGTD has already established a robust ex-post system where traders must have verifiable, third-party proof ready upon request for their most significant claims.
“The ECGTD has thus already established a robust (da Costa Machado 2025, 355) ex-post system where traders must have verifiable, third-party proof ready upon request for their most significant claims.”
From Green Labels, Red Flags: Comparative Legal Pathways to Environmental Legitimacy in the European Union and the People’s Republic of China (2025) · cites this paper as da Costa Machado 2025
The EU's dual-track enforcement model powerfully complements private litigation with public enforcement, as national competition and consumer authorities can impose fines for misleading practices that harm the market, creating a credible threat that discourages brand dilution.
“In the EU, while private litigation over damages faces similar challenges, the system is powerfully complemented by public enforcement (da Costa Machado 2025). National competition and consumer authorities can impose fines for misleading practices that harm the market, creating a credible threat that discourages the very kind of brand dilution seen in the shǒuliúdàn case.”
From Green Labels, Red Flags: Comparative Legal Pathways to Environmental Legitimacy in the European Union and the People’s Republic of China (2025) · cites this paper as da Costa Machado 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Costa Machado, S. M. D.
- Venue
- CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL
- Publisher
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- Published
- 2025-03-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 353-365
- ISSN
- 1989-4570 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408924697
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Law › European and International Contract Law
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative International Legal Studies
- Keywords
- greenwashing, unfair commercial practices, environmental claims, consumer protection, sustainable consumption, European Green Deal, circular economy, green marketing, European Union law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review