The DOI matches its DataCite record.
A Learning Analytics Tool for Usability Assessment in Moodle Environments
Open accessAbstract
The use of analytics technologies is increasingly successful in the e-learning domain. In this paper, we propose a novel model aiming at evaluating usability of interfaces adopted by Learning Management Systems and Massive Open Online Courses platforms based on the comparison between desktop and mobile versions, using specific native indicators. The indicators obtained from log files typically tracked by the e-learning platforms are defined as comparable scores. Then, to put the model into practice, we implemented it into Moodle LMS as a preliminary case study. This contribution promises to reduce both time and cost for quality assessment of user interfaces in the e-learning domain, while ensuring adaptability to different platforms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ten percent of the articles reviewed discussed the in-built statistical tools such as the facility index and discrimination index along with the databases available in LMSs for the use of educational and research purposes (Fenu et al., 2017; Gamage et al., 2019; Monllaó Olivé et al., 2020).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Fenu et al., 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenu, G., Marras, M., & Meles, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Venue
- Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society
- Publisher
- Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society
- Published
- 2017-09-30
- OpenAlex
- W2759038239
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Società Italiana di e-Learning
- Funders
- Regione Autonoma della Sardegna
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- learning analytics, usability evaluation, virtual learning environments, Moodle, mobile learning, user interface quality, log analysis, usability indicators, MOOC platforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
