The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
O sistema tecnológico digital: inteligência artificial, computação em nuvem e Big Data
Open accessAbstract
O avanço das tecnologias digitais na última década motivou análises a respeito de uma nova era no capitalismo. A maioria delas, contudo, é estreita em escopo, por abordar apenas tecnologias isoladas. Além disso, são curtas em temporalidade, por não reconhecerem os vínculos destas tecnologias digitais com o bloco de tecnologias de informação e comunicação precedentes. Propõe-se no presente trabalho uma visão de escopo mais amplo e temporalidade mais extensa para preencher estas lacunas. Conceituou-se o Sistema Tecnológico Digital (2010-2020) como o cluster de inteligência artificial, computação em nuvem e Big Data. Este cluster gera três fluxos de inovações: digitização, algoritmização e plataformização. As relações autocatalíticas entre as tecnologias deste cluster e entre sistemas prévios de TIC indicam continuidade histórica. No entanto, o fenômeno da comoditização de dados que se desdobra deste sistema configura-se como descontinuidade histórica de monta.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869
The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz022 · Cited by 634
Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems
Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1270 · Cited by 408
An Institutional Logics Perspective on the Gig Economy
Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., & Piscicelli, L. (2020) · Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000066005 · Cited by 118
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- AGRAWAL, A.; GANS, J.; GOLDFARB, A. Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence. Innovation Policy and the Economy, v. 19, n. 1, p. 139-159, 2019. · DOI
- ARRIETA-IBARRA, I. et al. Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond “free”. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, v. 108, p. 38-42, 2018. · DOI
- ATHIQUE, A. Integrated commodities in the digital economy. Media, Culture & Society, v. 42, n. 4, p. 554-570, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0163443719861815. · DOI
- ATKINSON, M. et al. (Ed.). The Data Bonanza: Improving Knowledge Discovery in Science, Engineering, and Business. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2013. · DOI
- BALDWIN, R. The globotics upheaval: globalization, robotics and the future of work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019.
- BLASIO, E.; SELVA, D. Implementing open government: a qualitative comparative analysis of digital platforms in France, Italy and United Kingdom. Quality & Quantity, v. 53, p. 871-896, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0793-7. · DOI
- BRESNAHAN, T. Technological change in ICT in light of ideas first learned about the machine tool industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 28, n. 2, p. 331-349, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty076. · DOI
- BRYNJOLFSSON, E.; ROCK, D.; SYVERSON, C. Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics, 2017. (NBER Working Paper Series, n. 24001). Disponível em: http://www.nber.org/papers/w24001. Acesso em: 28 de Agosto de 2020. · DOI
- BUNZ, M. The silent revolution: how digitalization transforms knowledge, work, journalism and politics without too much noise. Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.
- CHEN, B. et al. The disembedded digital economy: Social protection for new economy employment in China. Soc Policy Adm, p. 1-15, 2020. · DOI
- COHEN, J. Between truth and power: the legal constructions of informational capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019. · DOI
- COYLE, D.; NGUYEN, D. Cloud computing, cross-border data flows and new challenges for measurement in economics. National Institute Economic Review, n. 249, p. 30-38, 2019. · DOI
- CULOT, G. et al. The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 157, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120092. · DOI
- DIEGUES, A.C.; ROSELINO, J.E. Indústria 4.0 e as redes globais de produção e inovação em serviços intensivos tecnologia: uma tipologia e apontamentos de política industrial e tecnológica. Campinas, Unicamp. IE, 2019. (Texto para Discussão, n. 356). · DOI
- DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, v.11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982. · DOI · Paper page
- DOSI, G.; VIRGILLITO, M. Whither the evolution of the contemporary social fabric? New technologies and old socio-economic trends. International Labour Review, v. 158, n. 4, p. 593-625, 2019. · DOI
- EUROPEAN UNION. Digitising European Industry: reaping the full benefits of a Digital Single Market. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. European Commission, 2016. · DOI
- EVANGELISTA, R.; GUERRIERI, P.; MELICIANI, V. The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 23, n. 8, p. 802-824, 2014. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918438. · DOI
- FREEMAN, C., PEREZ, C. Structural crises of adjustment: business cycles and investment behavior. In: DOSI, G. et al. (Ed.). Technical change and economic theory. London, New York: Printer publishers, 1988. p. 38-66.
- I., MAIR, J., OBERG, A. (Ed.), Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2020. · DOI
- FUCHS, C.; MOSCO, V. (Ed.). Marx in the age of digital capitalism. Leiden, UK, Boston, US: Brill, 2016. · DOI
- GANDOMI, A.; HAIDER, M. Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, v. 35, n. 2, p. 137-144, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
- HINTON G.; OSINDERO, S.; THE, Y. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput, v. 18, n. 7, p. 1527-1554, 2006. · DOI · Paper page
- KATZENBACH, C.; ULBRICHT, L. Algorithmic Governance. Internet Policy Review, v. 8, n. 4, p. 1-18, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1424. · DOI · Paper page
- KENNEY, M. et al. Platforms and industrial change. Industry and Innovation, v. 26, n. 8, p. 871-879, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1602514. · DOI
- LANDES, D. The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
- LEE, K.; MALERBA, F.; PRIMI, A. The fourth industrial revolution, changing global value chains and industrial upgrading in emerging economies. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1735386. · DOI
- LIU, J. et al. Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china’s manufacturing sectors. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 158, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120142. · DOI
- MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, V.; CUKIER, K. Big Data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. Boston, New York: Eamon Dolan Book, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013. · DOI
- MOKYR, J. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1992. · DOI
- MOSCO, V. Becoming digital: toward a post-internet society. UK: Emerald Publishing: Bingley, 2017. · DOI
- NELSON, R. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 3, n. 1, p. 47-63, 1994. · DOI · Paper page
- NUVOLARI, A. Understanding successive industrial revolutions: A “development block” approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 32, p. 33-44, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.002. · DOI
- OECD. Data-Driven Innovation: Big Data for Growth and Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. DOI: doi.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en. · DOI
- PARKER, G.; VAN ALSTYNE, M.; CHOUDARY, S. Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. New York, London: W.W.Norton & Company, 2016. · DOI
- PARKER, G.; VAN ALSTYNE, M.; JIANG, X. Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, v. 41, n. 1, p. 255-266, 2016. · DOI
- PEREZ, C. Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, v. 15, n. 5, p. 357-375, 1983. · DOI
- PEREZ, C. Technological revolutions and financial capital: the dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002. · DOI
- PEREZ, C. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, n. 1, p. 185-202, 2009. · DOI
- PLANTIN, J. et al. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, v. 20, n. 1, p. 293-310, 2018. · DOI · Paper page
- POELL, T.; NIEBORG, D.; VAN DIJCK, J. Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, v. 8, n. 4, 2019. DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1425. · DOI · Paper page
- POLANYI, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, 1944. Reimpressão em 2001.
- ROSENBERG, N. Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
- ROTH, A. Como funcionam os mercados. São Paulo: Portfólio Penguin, 2015.
- SCHOT, J., KANGER, L. Deep transitions: emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Research Policy, v. 47, n. 6, p. 1045-1059, 2018. · DOI
- SRNICEK, N. Platform capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2017.
- STURGEON, T. Upgrading strategies for the digital economy. Global Strategy Journal, p 1-24, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1364 · DOI
- UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2017. Investment and the Digital Economy. Geneva: United Nations, 2017. · DOI
- UNCTAD. Digital Economy Report 2019. Value creation and capture: implications for developing countries. Geneva: United Nations, 2019. · DOI
- VAN DIJCK, J.; NIEBORG, D.; POELL, T. Reframing Platform Power. Internet Policy Review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1-18, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414. · DOI
- VAN DIJCK, J.; POELL, T.; de WAAL, M. Platform society: public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. · DOI · Paper page
- VAN DOORN, N.; BADGER, A. Platform capitalism’s hidden abode: producing data assets in the gig economy. Antipode, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/anti.12641. · DOI
- VELDKAMP, L.; CHUNG, C. Data and the aggregate economy. Journal of Economic Literature, 2019. (Working paper em preparação).
- WAREHAN, J.; FOX, P.; GINER, J. Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1195-1215, 2014. DOI: doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0895. · DOI · Paper page
- ZUBOFF, S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019. · DOI
- ZYSMAN, J.; KENNEY, M. The next phase in the digital revolution: intelligent tools, platforms, growth, and employment. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, v. 61, n. 2, p. 54-63, 2018. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dias, L. C., & Mesquita, F. C. (2026) · Revista da ANPEGE · doi:10.5418/ra2026.v22i47.21282
Metadata
- Authors
- Silva, V. J., Bonacelli, M. B. M., & Pacheco, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Venue
- Revista Brasileira de Inovação
- Publisher
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas
- Published
- 2020-12-28
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 1677-2504 (ISSN-L)
- 2178-2822
- OpenAlex
- W3116587986
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Revista Brasileira de Inovação (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Development and Digital Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, cloud computing, big data, information and communication technologies, digitization, algorithmization, platformization, data commodification, historical continuity and discontinuity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review