Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Open accessAbstract
An integrative framework is proposed to advance management research on technological platforms, bridging two theoretical perspectives: economics, which sees platforms as double-sided markets, and engineering design, which sees platforms as technological architectures. While the economic perspective informs our understanding of platform competition, the engineering design perspective informs our view of platform innovation. The article argues that platforms can be usefully conceptualized as evolving organizations or meta-organizations that: (1) federate and coordinate constitutive agents who can innovate and compete; (2) create value by generating and harnessing economies of scope in supply or/and in demand; and (3) entail a modular technological architecture composed of a core and a periphery. In support of this conceptualization, a classification system is presented, indicating that technological platforms appear in a variety of organizational forms: within firms, across supply chains, and across industry innovation ecosystems. As an illustration, the framework is then applied to derive a simple model highlighting patterns of interaction between platform innovation and competition, yielding hypotheses that could be tested empirically by future scholars.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because of their central role in encouraging project development, platforms are often thought to foster an ecosystem under the sponsorship of a platform leader which develops and provides specific functionality to smaller projects.
“Because of their central role in encouraging project development, they are often thought to foster an ecosystem under the sponsorship of a platform leader which develops and provides specific functionality to smaller projects (Gawer, 2014).”
From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Gawer, 2014
The Introduction and §5.2 describe platform leaders as orchestrating and nurturing innovation ecosystems. Section 4.1 says firms develop and share APIs that let independent developers use platform services in their own complementary innovations. The paper does not characterize those innovations as “smaller projects,” so that qualification is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredContent creators face a 'winner-take-all' situation.
“It also shows that content creators face a ‘winner-take-all’ situation (Cennamo and Santalo 2013, p. 1331; Gawer 2014, p. 1241).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Gawer 2014
Section 2.1 says strong network effects can, under certain conditions, produce a ‘winner-take-all’ outcome in competition between platforms. It does not extend that outcome to content creators; its video-game example instead describes developers being drawn to a platform with more users. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe service innovation and platform/network effects literatures lack a vocabulary and coherent framework for use recombination and its relation to value creation and capture in digital innovation.
“Even in the service innovation literature (Barrett et al. 2015;Lusch and Nambisan 2015), where value-in-use is emphasized, and in the platform and network effects literature (Gawer 2014;Parker et al. 2016), where demand and user adoption are important, there is a lack of a vocabulary and coherent framework for dealing with use recombination and how it relates to value creation and capture in digit”
From Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation (2018) · cites this paper as Gawer 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A resource‐based view of the firm
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207 · Cited by 25,635 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Given the entrality of economies of scope in theories of organizations (Teece, 980; Wernerfelt, 1984; Helfat and Eisenhardt, 2004), this comon underpinning provides the intuition that an organizational ens might be useful to develop a unifying framework for platforms. y organization I do not…”
BackgroundSocial Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
Uzzi, B. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393808 · Cited by 9,634 · see citing works
(2003) · Cited by 9,368 · see citing works
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499 · see citing works
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145 · see citing works
The Architecture of Complexity
Simon, H. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_31 · Cited by 6,459 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…by breaking up a complex system into discrete components, which interact through standardized interfaces within a standardized architecture, one can eliminate what would otherwise be an unmanageable spaghetti tangle of systemic interconnections (Simon, 1962; Parnas, 1972; Langlois, 2002).”
BackgroundPlatform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642 · see citing works
On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules
Parnas, D. L. (1972) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/361598.361623 · Cited by 4,719 · see citing works
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Badawy, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.05.003 · Cited by 3,635 · see citing works
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · Cited by 3,504 · see citing works
Competition in two-sided markets
Armstrong, M. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · Cited by 3,315 · see citing works
Two-sided markets: A progress report
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x · Cited by 2,994 · see citing works
General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-t · Cited by 2,879 · see citing works
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.821 · Cited by 2,831 · see citing works
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261409 · Cited by 2,622 · see citing works
TAKING STOCK OF NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J. J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159624 · Cited by 2,518 · see citing works
The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm
Ulrich, K. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 · Cited by 2,145 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…complexity of one of the elements crosses a certain threshold, that complexity can be isolated by defining a separate abstraction that has a simple 4 Ulrich (1995) defines product architecture as “the scheme by which the function of a product is allocated to physical components” (Ulrich, 1995, p.…”
BackgroundInfluentialPowell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. D. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421508 · Cited by 2,021 · see citing works
Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm
Teece, D. J. (1982) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90003-8 · Cited by 1,967 · see citing works
Orchestrating Innovation Networks
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923 · Cited by 1,803 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…on platforms to the literature on inter-organizational netork dynamics (Powell et al., 1996, 2005; Uzzi, 1997; Ahuja, 2000; rass et al., 2004; Dhanaraj and Parkhe, 2006; Zaheer et al., 2000) to erive insights on patterns of emergence and evolution of platform cosystems as networks of…”
BackgroundChicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593720 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise
Teece, D. J. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90002-5 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design
PARKER, G. G., & Alstyne, M. V. (2005) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400 · Cited by 1,684 · see citing works
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5360 · Cited by 1,565 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(from complementor to competitor for example, or vice versa) and associated shifting patterns of collaboration and competition, are in fact a feature of ecosystems (Iansiti and Levien, 2004), one that ought to be treated explicitly in rigorous attempts to theorize technological platforms.”
BackgroundTiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity
Schilling, M. A. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3312918 · Cited by 1,511 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The central tenet of the modularity literature is precisely that modular product architectures facilitate innovation (Langlois and Robertson, 1992; Baldwin and Clark, 2000; Schilling, 2000).”
BackgroundPlatform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002) · Cited by 1,486 · see citing works
Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization
Sturgeon, T. J. (2002) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/11.3.451 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation
Baldwin, C. Y., & von Hippel, E. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0618 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
The Economics of Two-Sided Markets
Rysman, M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.23.3.125 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.03.003 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0152 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control
Boudreau, K. J. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215 · Cited by 984 · see citing works
Strategies for Two-Sided Markets
Eisenmann, T. R., PARKER, G. G., & Alstyne, M. V. (2006) · Harvard business review · Cited by 983 · see citing works
The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution
Clark, K. B. (1985) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership
Meyer, M. H., & Lehnerd, A. P. (1997) · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Platforms, Markets and Innovation
(2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803311 · Cited by 931 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…are then defined as ‘. . .a building block, providing an essential function to a technological system – which acts as a foundation upon which other firms, loosely organized in an innovation ecosystem, can develop complementary products, technologies or services’ (Gawer, 2009a: 2; Gawer, 2009b: 54).”
BackgroundLanglois, R., & Robertson, P. (1992) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90030-8 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Modularity in technology and organization
Langlois, R. N. (2002) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00056-2 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Planning for Product Platforms
Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. T. (1998) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts
Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. L. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1975 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View
Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodard, C. J. (2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803311.00008 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review
Jiao, J. R., Simpson, T. W., & Siddique, Z. (2007) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2 · Cited by 861 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Platform design stands out as a common element across this set of organizational contexts (Huang et al., 2005; Simpson et al., 2006; Jiao et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDesign Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity
Hatch, N. W., Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259400 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1496336 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
The Architecture of Complexity
Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2007) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2007.384127 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Creating project plans to focus product development.
Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 778 · see citing works
Panzar, J. C. (1981) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Boudreau, K. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678 · Cited by 676 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…study of mobile andheld platforms, and finds an inverted U-shape relationship etween innovation and opening platform access, consistent with a crowding out” of innovation incentives when competition among omplementors increase beyond a certain level, a hypothesis conrmed in Boudreau (2012).”
BackgroundProduct platform design and customization: Status and promise
Simpson, T. W. (2004) · Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060404040028 · Cited by 629 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…exclusively through pricing Literature • Sanderson and Uzumeri (1995) • Brusoni (2005) • Gawer and Cusumano (2002) • Meyer and Lehnerd (1997) • Zirpoli and Becker (2011) • Baldwin and Woodard (2009) • Simpson (2004) • Sako (2009) • Boudreau (2010) • Eisenmann et al. (2011) n (au pace m 3 o s…”
BackgroundPlatform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel
Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x · Cited by 620 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Intel for example ook particular care to ensure that its complementors could remain rofitable by refraining to compete directly with them in a number f markets (Gawer and Henderson, 2007).”
BackgroundInter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification
Helfat, C. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.427 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries
Evans, D. S. (2003) · Review of Network Economics · doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1026 · Cited by 605 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…value of the platform stems rincipally from the access of “one side” to the “other side” of he platform, the question of platform adoption becomes “how to ring multiple sides on board” (Evans, 2003; Rochet and Tirole, 006) while avoiding the “chicken-and-egg problem” (Caillaud and ullien, 2003).”
BackgroundHow Companies Become Platform Leaders
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008) · Open Research (University of Surrey) · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Groysberg, B., McLean, A. N., & Nohria, N. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?Preprint
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. G., & Alstyne, M. W. V. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1264012 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Competition Between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages
Rysman, M. (2004) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/0034-6527.00512 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms
Baldwin, C. Y. (2007) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtm036 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2008) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803311.00014 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman
Sanderson, S. W., & Uzumeri, M. V. (1995) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00797-b · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution
Garud, R. B., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1995) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250160919 · Cited by 442 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This facilitates autonomous innovation within modules, as well as mix-and-match innovation through innovative recombination of modules (Garud and Kumaraswamy, 1995).”
BackgroundOrchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2011.63886529 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development
Krishnan, V., & Gupta, S. (2001) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.52.10665 · Cited by 418 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…specific kinds of esign choices on product architecture (Ulrich, 1995) that could elp firms generate product families (Sanderson and Uzumeri, 995) and innovate more quickly and systematically by using and e-using common assets (Krishnan and Gupta, 2001) as templates or product innovation.”
BackgroundOrganizations and meta-organizations
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.005 · Cited by 392 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Section 3 presents a classication system of three different categories of platforms (within 1 The concept of meta-organization, originally used by Ahrne and Brunsson (2005) o characterize organizations of organizations, was further clarified by Gulati et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInstitutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader
Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613492071 · Cited by 381 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…innovation in a way that protected complementors’ ncentives helped establish the continued support of an ecosystem f firms whose business models were tied to the new, open ‘Wintel’ Windows + Intel) PC architecture, which had by then become the ndustry platform (Gawer and Phillips, 2013).”
BackgroundA two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets
Wilbur, K. C. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0303 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage
Pil, F. K., & Cohen, S. K. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22528166 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries
Evans, D. S., Hagiu, A., & Schmalensee, R. (2006) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 311 · see citing works
The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation
Ethiraj, S. K., Levinthal, D. A., & Roy, R. R. (2008) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Huang, G. Q., Zhang, X., & Liang, L. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.014 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation
Dougherty, D. J., & Dunne, D. D. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0605 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Product Strategy for High Technology Companies
McGrath, M. E. (2000) · Cited by 249 · see citing works
The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’
Brusoni, S. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605059161 · Cited by 209 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…relations between supply-chain member organizations • Ecosystem governance ◦ In the special case of multi-sided markets: exclusively through pricing Literature • Sanderson and Uzumeri (1995) • Brusoni (2005) • Gawer and Cusumano (2002) • Meyer and Lehnerd (1997) • Zirpoli and Becker (2011) •…”
BackgroundMacDuffie, J. P. (2013) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01048.x · Cited by 195 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…being shared across firms within supply-chains (Brusoni, 2005; Zirpoli and Becker, 2011; Zirpoli and Caputo, 2002; Brusoni and Prencipe, 2009; Sturgeon, 2002; Doran, 2003; Huang et al., 2005; MacDuffie, 2013; MacDuffie and Helper, 2006; Sako, 2009; Simpson et al., 2006; Tatsumoto et al., 2009).”
Background(2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511493249 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Zirpoli, F., & Becker, M. C. (2010) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00629.x · Cited by 141 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…firms, research has also documented how manufacturing platforms were increasingly being shared across firms within supply-chains (Brusoni, 2005; Zirpoli and Becker, 2011; Zirpoli and Caputo, 2002; Brusoni and Prencipe, 2009; Sturgeon, 2002; Doran, 2003; Huang et al., 2005; MacDuffie, 2013;…”
BackgroundThe Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy
Peters, J. (2007) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/009430610703600424 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
The nature of buyer‐supplier relationships in co‐design activities
Zirpoli, F., & Caputo, M. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210452066 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework
Muffatto, M., & Roveda, M. (2002) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2002.003040 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The economic realities of open standards: black, white, and many shades of gray
West, J. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511493249.004 · Cited by 113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As explained earlier (and as in West, 2007), the concept of open interface is never black and white, and even within ecosystems, there are variations within the spectrum of how open these interfaces are.”
Supply chain implications of modularization
Doran, D. (2003) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570310462785 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction
Gawer, A. (2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803311.00006 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Markets with Two-Sided PlatformsPreprint
Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Collaboration in Supply Chains: With and Without Trust
MacDuffie, J. P., & Helper, S. R. (2008) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Platform-Based Product Family Development
Simpson, T. W., Siddique, Z., & Jiao, J. R. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-29197-0_1 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Dethroning an Established PlatformPreprint
Suárez, F. F. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Walled Garden Rivalry: The Creation of Mobile Network EcosystemsPreprint
Hazlett, T. W., Teece, D. J., & Waverman, L. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1963427 · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, Apple’s iPhone ecosystem has been described as a “walled garden” (Hazlett et al., 2011), while Google Android’s operating system has been seen as “more open”, and open source software has been seen as a purely open ecosystem.”
BackgroundClark, K. B. (1987) · 研究 技術 計画 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tatsumoto, H., Ogawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803311.00022 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Design Rules for Platform Leaders
Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803311.00020 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Baum (2000) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ahuja, G., 2000. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), 317-343.
- Fisher, F., McGowan, J.J., Greenwood, J.E., 1983. Folded, Spindled and Mutilated: Economic Analysis and U.S. vs. IBM. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., 1995. Technological and organizational designs to achieve economies of substitution. Strategic Management Journal 16, 93-110.
- Gawer, A., 2009c. Platforms dynamics and strategies: from products to services. In: Gawer, A. (Ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass, pp. 45-76.
- Santos, F.M., Eisenhardt, K.M., 2005. Organizational boundaries and theories of orga- nization. Organization Science 16 (5), 491-508.
- Sako, M., 2009. Outsourcing of tasks and outsourcing of assets: evidence from automotive suppliers parks in Brazil. In: Gawer, A. (Ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass, pp. 251-272.
- Zaheer, A., Gulati, R., Nohria, N., 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), 203.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724 · see citing works
“…also considers how technological interfaces (and which parts of the technology are “open” or “closed”) or governance (such as membership and participation rules) shape collective outcomes (Ceccagnoli et al ., 2012; Cennamo, 2016; Gawer & Cusumano, 2002; Gawer, 2014; Wareham et al ., 2014).”
InfluentialSelf-citationTeece, D. J. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015 · Cited by 1,823 · see citing works
The Digital Platform: A Research Agenda
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3 · Cited by 1,681 · see citing works
“Some scholars use ecosystems to denote the organisational form associated with an industry platform (Gawer, 2014) or as an unspecific notion of a collection of assets (Thomas et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready
Helmond, A. (2015) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305115603080 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
“…Gawer argues, platforms have often been theorized from two distinct perspectives: “economic theory conceptualizes platforms as markets (Rochet & Tirole, 2003),” whereas “engi-neering design theorizes them as ‘modular technological architectures’ (Baldwin & Woodard, 2009)” (Gawer, 2014, p. 1240).”
BackgroundInnovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2019) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098 · Cited by 1,360 · see citing works
The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818769694 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
“Particularly problematic is that business scholars tend to treat platforms as relatively static objects (Gawer, 2014; Tiwana, 2014).”
Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps
McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2596 · Cited by 1,109 · see citing works
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019 · Cited by 1,060 · see citing works
Bogers, M. L. A. M., Zobel, A., Afuah, A. N., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M. B., Haefliger, S., et al. (2016) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
“…challenge is to innovate together and preserve the collective welfare as defined by the overall vibrancy or performance of the ecosystem, while at the same time preserving or enhancing the individual performance of ecosystem members in competitive markets (Lopez-Berzosa and Gawer 2014).”
Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
“However, major emphasis is on using an industrial level of analysis, with less attention on the implications for internal organization (Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodIntroduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0794 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
“Just as platforms facilitate the connection between supply and demand (Baldwin and Clark 2000, Gawer 2014), digital infrastructures provide the necessary computing and networking resources.”
BackgroundHein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
“The degree of openness also influences competition within and across ecosystems (Gawer 2014; Thomas et al. 2014).”
BackgroundEmbracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns1
Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.12 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
“2010), APIs and software patterns (Alexander 1999), and the network effects of digital platforms (Gawer 2014).”
BackgroundMobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges
Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.v2i2.931 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
“Technically, integration of services may be realised by using so-called platform technology, which facilitates interactions between trav-ellers and suppliers of transport services in an improved or smarter way (Ballon, 2009; Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialUnpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
“We also identi fi ed some opportunities for further research. i) It is not clearhowa fi rmbecomes aleader of anindustryplatform(as suggested by Gawer, 2014); ii) Which the organizational processes to implement and manage an industry platform are; iii) How to integrate the supply chain platform and…”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Agile Business Model Innovation in Digital Entrepreneurship: Lean Startup Approaches
Ghezzi, A., & Cavallo, A. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.013 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
“…C - a common factor for all three digital startups was that they operated a multisided platform business connecting different pools of customers (Gawer, 2014; Evans and Schmalensee, 2016) and, having selected similar business approaches, it was easier to carry our comparisons and cross-case…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies
Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A. E., Schilling, M. A., & Vasudeva, G. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3250 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces
Gawer, A. (2021) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces
Taeuscher, K., & Laudien, S. M. (2017) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
“Marketplaces, a rapidly emerging category of platforms (Gawer, 2014; McIntyre & Srinivasan, 2016), enable and support transactions between independent supply-and demand-side participants.”
BackgroundA review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design
Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
“On the other hand, many researchers set ecosystem design as a research topic in their papers (Gawer, 2014; Gawer and Cusumano, 2014; Hienerth et al., 2014; Khavul and Bruton, 2013; Wareham et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2014).”
Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories
Nambisan, S., Zahra, S. A., & Luo, Y. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00262-4 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
“Platforms constitute a shared set of technologies, components, services, architecture, and relationships that serve as a common foundation for diverse sets of actors to converge and create value (Gawer & Cusumano, 2002; Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundAdopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization
Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.033 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
“…offerings into a coherent, customer-facing solution” (Adner, 2006: 98), at the core of an innovation ecosystem one often finds a technology platform: a set of shared assets, standards, and interfaces that underpins an activity system surrounding it (Gawer, 2014; Thomas, Autio, & Gann, 2014).”
BackgroundThe Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship
Nambisan, S., Siegel, D. S., & Kenney, M. F. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1300 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
“However, the essential concepts underlying their application have remained the same—modular architectures have standardized interfaces that: (a) enable the reuse of shared components or assets that, in turn, leads to economies of scale and scope in innovation (Bresnahan & Trajtenberg, 1995; Gawer, 2014); and (b) allow…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlgorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. W. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15333 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature
Rietveld, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320969791 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
“First, following the notion that successfully managing a platform ecosystem is an inherently dynamic process (Gawer, 2014), future research will benefit from studying evolving governance strategies over time and as a function of other factors.”
Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda
Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12326 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
“…the generation of network effects can be the source of tremendous benefit to users and profit for platform owners, they can eventually lead to winner-take-all scenarios, where industries are dominated by a few platform players (Gawer, 2014), potentially leading to detrimental impacts on users.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRoles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S., & Ortt, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
“Notwithstanding, there have been recent calls to enhance our understanding of how innovation ecosystems come into existence in the first place (Gawer, 2014; Autio and Thomas, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialPlatform-Dependent Entrepreneurs: Power Asymmetries, Risks, and Strategies in the Platform Economy
Cutolo, D., & Kenney, M. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2019.0103 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms
Howcroft, D., & Bergvall‐Kåreborn, B. (2018) · Work Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017018760136 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Integrating Research on Interorganizational Networks and Ecosystems
Shipilov, A. V., & Gawer, A. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0121 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
“In the initial phase of industrial digital platform development, manufacturers often develop product platforms around key installed bases (Gawer, 2014; Sandebrg et al., 2020; Svahn et al., 2017).”
BackgroundLokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Dongming Xu, A. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Competing in Digital Markets: A Platform-Based Perspective
Cennamo, C. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0048 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Digital platforms and ecosystems: remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age
Gawer, A. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2021.1965888 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
“…of platforms, ecosystems, and digital innovation, these themes were not mainstream in management research (see, for example, Cusumano et al., 2019, 2021; Gawer, 2009, 2014; Gawer & Cusumano, 2002, 2014; Gawer & Srnicek, 2021; Jacobides et al., 2018; McIntyre et al., 2020; Shipilov & Gawer, 2020).”
BackgroundInnovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?
Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation
Henfridsson, O., Nandhakumar, J., Scarbrough, H., & Panourgias, N. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.03.001 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
“As path channeling is successfully achieved, the chances that a firm's digital resource turns into a platform, that is, an "evolving organizations or meta-organizations composed of agents who can innovate and compete" (Gawer 2014, p. 1240), increases.”
InfluentialThe platform economy: restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation
Kenney, M. F., & Zysman, J. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsaa001 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
“According to Annabelle Gawer (2014, 1239), ‘platforms are evolving organisations or meta-organisations that (1) federate and coordinate constitutive agents who can innovate and compete; (2) create value by generating and harnessing economies of scope in supply or/and in demand side of the markets; and (3) entail a mod…”
BackgroundPlatform Strategy: Managing Ecosystem Value Through Selective Promotion of Complements
Rietveld, J., Schilling, M. A., & Bellavitis, C. (2019) · Organization science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1290 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
“…interplay in how each element of the bundle contributes to the overall value of the system, and there are important interdependencies between the actions of the members comprising the ecosystem (Pierce 2009, Ceccagnoli et al. 2012, Gawer 2014, McIntyre and Srinivasan 2017, Jacobides et al. 2018).”
Hermes, S., Riasanow, T., Clemons, E. K., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00125-x · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains
Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., & Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
“Different types of platforms have been described in the literature (Gawer 2014; Thomas et al.”
BackgroundThe “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms
Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W. (2017) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12493 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
“Economists take a different approach and emphasize that these are multisided markets—that is, the platform faces both workers and consumers (Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundAhmed, A. R., Bhatti, S. H., Gölgeci̇, İ., & Arslan, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121513 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
“However, prior research has primarily focused on the role of external factors in strengthening DPC, particularly at the industrial level (e.g., Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundDecentralized Governance of Digital Platforms
Chen, Y., Richter, J., & Patel, P. C. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320916755 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
“Digital platforms are digital systems that facilitate communications, interactions, and innovations to support economic transactions and social activities (Cennamo, 2019; Constantinides, Henfridsson, & Parker, 2018; Gawer, 2014; McIntyre & Srinivasan, 2017; Thomas, Autio, & Gann, 2014).”
BackgroundCiriello, R., Richter, A., & Schwabe, G. (2018) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
“A digital technology platform is ‘‘a building block, providing an essential function to a technological system – which acts as a foundation upon which other firms can develop complementary products, technologies or services’’ (Gawer 2014, p. 2).”
BackgroundEcosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce
Li, J., Chen, L., Yi, J., Mao, J., & Liao, J. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00263-3 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“…considerable management research and much of it suggests that understanding platforms and their ecosystems requires new theoretical insights (e.g., Gawer, 2014; Gawer & Cusumano, 2014; McIntyre & Srinivasan, 2017; Nambisan, Lyytinen, Majchrzak, & Song, 2017; Teece, 2018; Yoo, Boland, Lyytinen, &…”
BackgroundPlatform Architecture and Quality Trade-offs of Multihoming Complements
Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0779 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“2 A platform’s technological architecture shapes its core functionalities (Baldwin and Woodard 2009, Gawer 2014), which can affect both competitive performance (Gawer and Cusumano 2002, Zhu and Iansiti 2012) and incentives of independent firms to develop complements (Anderson et al. 2014, Tiwana et…”
BackgroundInfluentialEngagement platforms in the sharing economy
Breidbach, C. F., & Brodie, R. J. (2017) · Journal of Service Theory and Practice · doi:10.1108/jstp-04-2016-0071 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Roberts, A., & Xu, L. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3148 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Designing a multi-sided data platform: findings from the International Data Spaces case
Otto, B., & Jarke, M. (2019) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00362-x · Cited by 264 · see citing works
“This is somewhat surprising, as Gawer (2014) and de Reuver et al. (2018), for example, consider the na-scence (or “ genesis ” ) of MSPs a very promising and worth-while area of research.”
BackgroundInfluentialDynamic Capabilities and (Digital) Platform Lifecycles
Teece, D. J. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-332220170000037008 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“All these uses remain relevant (Gawer, 2014).”
Cozzolino, A., Corbo, L., & Aversa, P. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.058 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
“…argument of the platform ecosystems literature is that technological evolution in interdependency situations stimulates competition and cooperation (Gawer, 2014; Hannah & Eisenhardt, 2018), and that platform owners need to balance their business and technological decisions not to discourage…”
Complexity and Information Systems Research in the Emerging Digital World
Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/13304 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
“Some firms transition from a portfolio of digitized products to a product platform over which they develop an offer of a family of derivative digital products (Gawer 2014).”
How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward
Dahlander, L., Gann, D., & Wallin, M. W. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104218 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
“Platforms are distinct from traditional companies in the way they mediate transactions across particpants and how they create network effects (Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundThe Platform Political Economy of FinTech: Reintermediation, Consolidation and Capitalisation
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2020) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
“A core feature of the platform business model is the intermediation of multi-and two-sided markets (Gawer 2014).”
BackgroundThe future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0
Culot, G., Orzes, G., Sartor, M., & Nassimbeni, G. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120092 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
“The current debate on Industry 4.0 in manufacturing has only partially been influenced by the “economic perspective” of platform research so far (Gawer, 2014; McIntyre and Srinivisan, 2017), the main focus being on manufacturers sponsoring technological platforms to engage with third-party…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe evolution of platform business models: Exploring competitive battles in the world of platforms
Zhao, Y., von Delft, S., Morgan‐Thomas, A., & Buck, T. (2019) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101892 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“This is also what differentiates multi-sided platforms from manufacturing or product platforms that firms may use to optimize manufacturing of a product or a family of related products in concert with a network of suppliers (Gawer, 2014; Krishnan and Gupta, 2001).”
BackgroundInnovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“This in turn increases the probability of achieving innovation through the digital platforms [64,65].”
BackgroundDoes Platform Owner’s Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence from Google Photos
Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Mithas, S., & Heinzl, A. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0787 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14520 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Holgersson, M., Granstrand, O., & Bogers, M. L. A. M. (2017) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.007 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
“…and open innovation, it is also relevant for future research and management of coopetition (e.g., Brandenburger and Nalebuff, 1996; Gnyawali and Park, 2011; Fernandez et al., 2014; Bouncken et al., 2015) and platforms (e.g., Gawer, 2014; Gawer and Cusumano, 2014; Bogers et al., 2017), respectively.”
BackgroundAn Ecosystem-Level Process Model of Business Model Disruption: The Disruptor's Gambit
Snihur, Y., Thomas, L. D. W., & Burgelman, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12343 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12351 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Digitalization in retailing: multi-sided platforms as drivers of industry transformation
Hänninen, M., Smedlund, A., & Mitronen, L. (2017) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-04-2017-0109 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
“…inter-or intradependent networks where participants co-create value (Adner & Kapoor 2009; Autio & Thomas 2014; Kijima 2015; Smedlund & Faghankhani 2015) and to which participants attach complementary products, services or technologies (Jacobides et al. 2006; Gawer & Cusumano 2014; Gawer 2014).”
BackgroundJacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104906 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“…knowledge spillovers between the interdependent modular components of a technological system and their providers (Boudreau, 2010; Gawer and Cusumano, 2002, 2014; Gawer, 2014); adoption of components across the system (Ozcan and Santos, 2015); and integration of system components (Boudreau, 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationVeile, J., Schmidt, M.-C., & Voigt, K. (2022) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.062 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Nieborg, D. B., & Helmond, A. (2018) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443718818384 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
“…and platforms studies and information systems research are particularly sensitive to the medium-specificity of platforms as programmable and extensible technical systems that enact institutional relationships through software (Bogost and Montfort, 2009; Gawer, 2014; McIntyre and Srinivasan, 2017).”
BackgroundMutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing
Khanagha, S., Ansari, S. S., Paroutis, S., & Oviedo, L. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3147 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
“…and Gann, 2014; Van Alstyne, Parker and Choudary, 2016) and have left many incumbents either disadvantaged (Eisenmann, Parker and Van Alstyne, 2011; Gawer, 2014), disrupted (e.g., Kumaraswamy, Garud & Ansari, 2018), or struggling to grow at the rates that markets expect (Benner and Ranganathan,…”
BackgroundMulti-sided platforms as new organizational forms
McIntyre, D., Srinivasan, A., Afuah, A., Gawer, A., & Kretschmer, T. (2020) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2018.0018 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms
Järvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., & Ritala, P. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.007 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
“This approach is informed by recent suggestions (e.g., Gawer, 2014) that an organizational perspective can further our understanding of knowledge creation in knowledge ecosystems.”
Open innovation, information, and entrepreneurship within platform ecosystems
Eckhardt, J., Ciuchta, M. P., & Carpenter, M. A. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1298 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Digital platform openness: Drivers, dimensions and outcomes
Broekhuizen, T., Emrich, O., Gijsenberg, M. J., Broekhuis, M., Donkers, B., & Sloot, L. M. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.001 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“…platforms' functionality via increased network effects and innovation potential (Binken & Stremersch, 2009; Claussen, Essling, & Kretschmer, 2015; Gawer, 2014), one of the key challenges of this increased openness is the need to maintain control over all parties involved (Boudreau, 2010;…”
BackgroundFlew, T., Martin, F. R., & Suzor, N. P. (2019) · Journal of Digital Media & Policy · doi:10.1386/jdmp.10.1.33_1 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“Annabelle Gawer (2014) envisaged platforms as evolving technological organizations that create multi-sided markets, federating and coordinating Internet actors in innovation and competition, and creating value by harnessing economies of scope in supply or/and in demand.”
BackgroundConfigurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement
Saadatmand, F., Lindgren, R., & Schultze, U. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.015 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“Digital platforms 1 as an emergent organizational form (Gawer, 2014; Nambisan et al., 2017) are characterized by (1) technology: a technological architecture constituted of a modular core, standardized interfaces, and complementary extensions (e.g., Baldwin and Woodard, 2009; Karhu et al., 2018),…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWhat is digital transformation? Core tensions facing established companies on the global stage
Furr, N., Özcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2022) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1442 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
“Ecosystems may (or may not) overlap with platforms (Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundPlatform-based servitization and business model adaptation by established manufacturers
Tian, J., Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., & Lei, S. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102222 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Offerings as Digitalized Interactive Platforms: A Conceptual Framework and Implications
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0365 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“…enhanced through interactions in offerings as DIPs that were not mere intermediaries between different types of customers, as in demand-side economic markets, for instance (Rochet and Tirole 2006), or modularizations of products, as in supply-side product development, for instance (Gawer 2014).”
BackgroundDigital Platforms for the Circular Economy: Exploring Meta-Organizational Orchestration Mechanisms
Blackburn, O., Ritala, P., & Keränen, J. (2022) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/10860266221130717 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
“Digital platforms have traditionally been conceptualized in economic and technological terms as two- or multi-sided markets built on a technological architecture that intermediates transactions among platform actors (Gawer, 2014; Sun & Tse, 2009; Tura et al., 2018).”
BackgroundThe path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and open business models
Visnjic, I., Neely, A. D., & Jovanovic, M. (2018) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.003 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“For instance, some fi rms choose to establish a dynamic control over di ff erent stakeholders, while relying on them to provide products and services to each other (Dattée et al., 2017; Gawer, 2014; Gawer and Cusumano, 2002).”
BackgroundThe Translucent Hand of Managed Ecosystems: Engaging Communities for Value Creation and Capture
Altman, E. J., Nagle, F., & Tushman, M. L. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2020.0244 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Klievink, B., Bharosa, N., & Tan, Y. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.002 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“From an organizational perspective, studies on platforms often address questions like how to become a platform leader (Gawer, 2009), how to make money on offering something via a platform (Eaton, 2012), or on the role and level of control that developers have (Tiwana et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBereznoy, A. V., Meissner, D., & Scuotto, V. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2020-0769 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
The platform economy matures: measuring pervasiveness and exploring power
Kenney, M., Bearson, D. F., & Zysman, J. (2021) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwab014 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“When we say ‘platform’, we are referring to a digital exchange platform firm, defined as online places or infrastructures (i.e. websites and mobile apps) designed spe-cifically to facilitate transactions and other valued exchanges of goods, information and opinion (Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundFacebook’s evolution: development of a platform-as-infrastructure
Helmond, A., Nieborg, D. B., & van der Vlist, F. N. (2019) · Internet Histories · doi:10.1080/24701475.2019.1593667 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
“Additionally, Facebook made a number of high-profile acquisitions, including Instagram (already in 2012), WhatsApp (2014), Oculus VR (2014), and LiveRail (2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom proprietary to collective governance: How do platform participation strategies evolve?
O'Mahony, S. C., & Karp, R. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3150 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination
Hong, H., & Shi, Y. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
How digital platform capability affects the innovation performance of SMEs—Evidence from China
Jiang, H., Yang, J., & Gai, J. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102187 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance?
Ansell, C., & Miura, S. (2020) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12636 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Building the Value of Next-Generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns
Cennamo, C. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316658350 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“A technological platform is a stable set of technological components that are shared and reused by developers of diverse complements (Baldwin & Woodard, 2009; Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialDigital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review
Bejjani, M., Göcke, L., & Menter, M. (2023) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122372 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Rolland, K. H., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0788 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
“Gawer (2014) further argued that agents can be both individuals and firms, hence diverging from the typical economic perspective on digital platforms, which focuses on consumers.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Paradigmatic Analysis of Digital Application Marketplaces
Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.16 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
“Our decision of going for a two-dimensional typology with control and functionality scope as main dimensions re fl ects an engineering design view of platforms (Gawer, 2014), as well as the need to strike a balance between simplicity and granularity.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFostering digital platform innovation: From two to multi‐sided platforms
Trabucchi, D., & Buganza, T. (2019) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12320 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Sharing Economy, Sharing Responsibility? Corporate Social Responsibility in the Digital Age
Etter, M. A., Fieseler, C., & Whelan, G. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04212-w · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“…and controlling developments in ICTs – e.g., mobile apps that enable quick and automated identification and matching of these exchange partners (Gawer, 2014) – platform managers and owners become hierarchically central to sharing activities and can potentially generate significant levels of…”
BackgroundRietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0064 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
“weight to the claim that successfully managing a platform ecosystem is an inherently dynamic process (Gawer, 2014; Tiwana et al., 2010).”
Can self-regulation save digital platforms?
Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2021) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab052 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gawer, A.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gawer, Annabelle
- ORCID
- Gawer, Annabelle
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1239-1249
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052419127
- Cited by
- 1,869
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 223 · 2021: 274 · 2020: 197 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 153.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- EPSRC NEMODE Network+
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
- Keywords
- technology platforms, technical architecture, platform competition, platform innovation, meta-organizations, economies of scope, modular architecture, core-periphery, platform classification, supply chain platforms, innovation ecosystems, integrative framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review