Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diplomasi Budaya Jepang dan Korea Selatan di Indonesia tahun 2020: Studi Komparasi

Islamiyah, Annisa Nur, Priyanto, Nafila Maulina, Prabhandari, Ni Putu Dyana·2020·Jurnal Hubungan Internasional
DOI 10.20473/jhi.v13i2.21644
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Products of the creative industry, which falls under the category of culturalproducts, represent one of soft power instruments capable of influencingpolicy-making processes. Japan and South Korea are two states that haveimplemented internationalization strategies on their creative industryproducts in order to boost economy. In addition to becoming sectors thatcontribute to the economy, by the means of the Korean Hallyu and CoolJapan, the creative industries of Japan and South Korea have becomeinstruments of cultural diplomacy aimed at influencing public opinionson both states. In Indonesia, differences in the development strategiesimplemented by both states have influenced the degree of success in theircultural diplomacy. This research aims to identify differences betweenthe strategies implemented by Japan and South Korea in conductingcultural diplomacy in Indonesia. This research has found that the culturaldiplomacy conducted by Japan has been less successful due to the lackof incorporation of cultural values in its internationalization strategy, aswell as the lack of government support for its creative industry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20473/jhi.v13i2.21644

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Grafik 1. Opinion Poll terhadap Jepang di Indonesia
Grafik 1. Opinion Poll terhadap Jepang di IndonesiaCC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Grafik 2. Opinion Polls tentang Ketertarikan Masyarakat Indonesia terhadap Budaya Jepang
Grafik 2. Opinion Polls tentang Ketertarikan Masyarakat Indonesia terhadap Budaya JepangCC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Grafik 3. Tren Budaya Populer Jepang di Indonesia Tahun 2013-2019
Grafik 3. Tren Budaya Populer Jepang di Indonesia Tahun 2013-2019CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Grafik 4. Minat Pencarian Web dari Kata Kunci K-Pop, K-Drama, Budaya Korea, dan Korea Selatan di Indonesia
Grafik 4. Minat Pencarian Web dari Kata Kunci K-Pop, K-Drama, Budaya Korea, dan Korea Selatan di IndonesiaCC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Grafik 5. Popularitas K-Drama Indonesia 2019
Grafik 5. Popularitas K-Drama Indonesia 2019CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Grafik 6. Negara dengan Jumlah Penonton K-Pop Tertinggi 2019
Grafik 6. Negara dengan Jumlah Penonton K-Pop Tertinggi 2019CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Goff, Patricia M., 2013. "Cultural Diplomacy," dalam Cooper, A. F., · DOI
  2. J. Heine, dan R. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of
  3. Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Guide. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  5. Tuch, Hans N., 1990. Communicating with the World: US Public · DOI
  6. Diplomacy Overseas. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  7. Comparative Public Diplomacy Studies," Andalas Journal of
  8. International Studies, 1(2): 182-198.
  9. Culture and Society," The Journal of Popular Culture, 38(3):
  10. Sociology, 2(3): 196-202.
  11. University Press, 13: 41-47.
  12. in Presidential Speeches," International Journal of
  13. Nye, Joseph S., 2008. "Public Diplomacy and Soft Power," The · DOI
  14. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
  15. Science, 616 (1): 94-109.
  16. Padjajaran, 1(1): 24.
  17. Figueroa Press.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Islamiyah, A. N., Priyanto, N. M., & Prabhandari, N. P. D.
Venue
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional
Publisher
Universitas Airlangga
Published
2020-11-28
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
257
ISSN
  • 2715-1565
  • 1411-9382
DOI
10.20473/jhi.v13i2.21644
Cited by
1
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.